Thursday, November 19, 2009

Doug Hoffman Wants Recount! 4 Districts reported ZERO Votes

Four Districts report zero votes for Hoffman?

Yeah right- maybe in a Hussein's Country would zero% of a vote be reported for any opposition...

I watched that Vote being tabulated on the Fox screen all night and a peculiar oddity struck me each time the count was shown. No matter what the count was, Owens was ALWAYS 3-4 thousand ahead.
I have never seen a count remain so consistently unwavering.

If Hoffman had 13,000 - Owens had 17,000. If Hoffman had 17,000, Owens had 21,000. If Hoffman had 21,000 then Owens had 25,000...all night at every count reported this pattern repeated itself.

I found the pattern very suspicious.

That is what it has come to in our country I suppose...we no longer believe in an uncorrupted voter system.

And no matter what Bills I have read of the past to structure the voting system to eliminate voter fraud it's passage is always shot down by Democrats.

Ask yourself- Why is that?

Here's the one thing. We are told for months now that all will be well come 2010 because we can VOTE THE BUMS OUT!!!

But can we vote them out?

How do you vote the Bums out when these politicians have set up a system to employ dishonest tactics and encourage and reward fraud?

How do you vote them out when Mickey Mouse doesn't need to show proof of legal residence, birth, citizenship, or existence?

Until One legal vote for One person is addressed we are still looking at community organized fraud come 2010.

Four Districts report zero votes for Hoffman - B.S.

Here is a letter from Doug Hoffman rescinding his concession of the NY-23:

Dear Fellow Conservative,

As evidence surfaces, we find out that reported results from election night were far from accurate. ACORN and the unions did their best to try and sway the results to Obamacare supporter Bill Owens.

I was forced to concede after receiving two pieces of grim news - - down 5,335 votes with 93 percent of the vote counted on election night - and barely won my stronghold in Oswego County.
On Election Night, the information we received was far different from what we received this week!

Rest assured, they will not succeed, and I am therefore revoking my statement of concession.

That is why I am writing you today. Recent developments leave me to wonder who is scheming behind closed doors, twisting arms and stealing elections from the voters of NY-23.

I'm sure you are as dismayed as I am to learn of the mischief that took place in Oswego and neighboring counties. We know this would not be the first time for the ACORN faithful to tamper with democracy.

Now it's time to actually count every legal ballot and I need your help to ensure the people of NY-23 get the Congressman THEY ELECTED. Please donate now to help me ensure every vote is counted!

A re canvassing in the 11-county district shows Owens' lead has narrowed to 3,026. In Oswego County, I was reported to lead by only 500 votes with 93 percent of the vote counted election night, but inspectors found I actually won by 1,748 votes

Let’s force them keep this re canvassing active! Let’s give this election a chance to end differently!
Oswego County elections officials blame the mistakes on "chaos" in their call-in center that included a phone system foul-up, and on inspectors who read numbers incorrectly when phoning in results. This sounds like a tactic right from the ACORN playbook.

The district's second biggest voter turnout was in Jefferson County, where I had also benefited from a turnaround since election night, gaining another 700 votes. Owens led by 300 votes on the final election night tally, but after re canvassing, I'm now leading by 424 votes.

Jerry Eaton, the Republican elections commissioner for Jefferson County, said inspectors found a problem in four districts where my vote total was mistakenly entered as zero.

The new vote totals mean the race will be decided by absentee ballots, of which the state Board of Elections distributed about 10,200.

The people of NY-23 deserve to have their ballots counted properly, but we can't let ACORN or the unions keep that from happening. They have more lawyers and more experience tampering with democracy.
State Board of Elections Communications Director John Conklin said the state sent a letter to the House Clerk last week explaining that no winner had been determined in the 23rd District.

Now it's time to actually count every legal ballot and I need your help to ensure the people of NY-23 get the Congressman THEY ELECTED. Please donate now to help me ensure every vote is counted!

We need to make sure that fair elections are a reality in NY-23, just like our Founding Fathers envisioned. So long as we remain the "land of the free," we MUST ensure every vote is counted.
Help us today so we may be the first of many conservative victories during the Obama Regime.

Yours in Freedom,

Doug Hoffman

P.S. I ran a different kind of campaign, one where Conservatives, Republicans, Libertarians, Tea Party and 9/12 activists rallied around. ACORN, the unions and Democratic Party were scared, and that's why they tampered with the ballots of voters in NY-23. Will you please contribute today so we can show them that fair elections are the Will of the People? Thank you.

blamed on: inspectors who read numbers incorrectly when phoning in results...

Are these inspectors running ??

Who's watching the inspectors?

It is also being reported that the computer systems may have been infected with a virus.

Here's another interesting thought - "State Board of Elections Communications Director John Conklin said the state sent a letter to the House Clerk last week explaining that no winner had been determined in the 23rd District."

If this is so, that there is no winner - then Owens' vote on the House health care Bill would not count would it?
In retrospect, Joseph Cao,(R)who waited until the last minute to cast his vote, would have been faced with an entirely different choice when the count reached it's final moment.

The manipulation of the abortion issue showed democrats were willing to throw their women constituents and abortion rhetoric under the bus -- but, remember, they were hard line pro-choice before they temporarily traded against it.

Temporarily traded - because as we saw, Republican John Boehner demonstrated several times during the debates - everyone knows that the Stubeck amendment was nothing more than a manipulation of the count.

And to think that this House Stealth Squared Pill may never have passed but for some squirrels in the uninspected Owens phone lines.

Tuesday, November 17, 2009

Unnecessary (Costly) Mammography Tests

...And so it begins.

Here is a beginning sign of Health care guideline rationing to come from government sponsored entities legislating recommended cost saving effectiveness.

The new government recommendations, released Monday by the Preventive Services Task Force of the Department of Health and Human Services, recommend against regular mammography tests in women aged 40 to 49. The guidelines also downplay the effectiveness of self-examinations and advise that women aged 50 to 74 years receive mammograms every other year.

Here we are witnessing one of Obama's costly "unnecessary tests" in the making.

Breast cancer is the number two cancer killer of women in the U.S. but for all the 'talk' about prevention one of the very first things to go, under analytical examination of costs vs effectiveness, is early detection coverage.

Make no mistake- it won't be covered if the guidelines are changed.

Is this a manipulation to get Insurance Companies to fall into the trap of not covering these exams? Sure. If they don't have to pay for it they are not going too.

Then, after you complain to high heaven about not being covered, you can turn to your Obama/Kathleen Sebelius/Nancy-Ann DeParle/ Government Health care plan who also won't cover you- lest we forget who directed the rationing guidelines to begin with.

This is insurance reform, right?

Your Health care just took a giant leap towards improvement? Yes?

Of course you MAY still have an option to pay for exams out of your own pocket between 40-49...MAY...or there may be a plan to cover you - depending on the premium you can afford and further 'guidelines' we haven't even imagined yet.

The Party of mandatory Revenue and cost controlled No-Care has delivered a message.

Are you listening?

Sunday, November 8, 2009

Extremist Signs at Health care Bachmann Rally?


Of all the thousands of signs at the Capitol Health care rally the Internet is awash with reports of the 'offensive signs' that people showed up with.
Well, to be clear, some report that signs were being handed out - implying the handed out ones may have been those they found offensive.

They can only come up with a few signs that they found offensive and use these signs as their reason to condemn people who showed up as wackos.

Headlines: The 12 Most Offensive Signs From Bachmann's Tea Party ...spread the twelth.

Almost everyone of these search-and-deploy disinformation authors included in their copy-n-paste condemnation write-ups that 9 Bachmann wackos were arrested.

This fueled many responses on their websites gleefully attacking the people who came to the Capitol anti-government-controlled-Health-care rally as violent, criminal, and nuts.

Pssssst!!...The 9 arrested were pro government controlled health care people.

I was amazed that so many sites turned the protest into a race issue too. "The crowds were white right wing extremists"...
I was also surprised by the amount of Obama people who came out too support the media authors on their comments web pages.
Surprised because they have been unusually absent from websites that produce facts they can't refute.

This "sign" issue sucked the bama trollers back into life like an engorging tick on a bloodhound.

It is repeatedly reported that these health care protest participants are "Republicans".

Has anyone polled the crowds yet? It is hard to believe that there aren't Democrats in all these crowds. I recall last year the MILLIONS of Hillary supporters who helped expose Obama's background and the DNC corruption. They didn't just suddenly become couch minions of the party.

Don't describe the assembled as peaceful concerned Americans - describe them instead as 'angry' right wing 'Republicans'.

Redefine Americans. Redraw the issue. Keep people divided.

Agitate the bitter and move the fence sitter.

Why would someone be carrying a Maoist sign anyway??
Oh yeah- that's right. Obama's radical Czarina, Anita Dunn's favorite philosopher being -Mao.

Mao in the White House.
Chavez in the White House.
Communists in the White House
Alinsky in the White House.
Marx in the White House.

OH MY! People carrying a sign, or signs, comparing Obama with Marx!!

Either you aren't doing your homework or you're a part of the cover up problem.

Using Obama's own eloquent words why would anyone think that his vernacular, in many cases, is exact quotes of Karl?

Obama's hand picked Czars are Maoists-Marxist-communists-socialists-globalists- anti-capitalists - and they admire dictators and spurn our founding Constitution as needing to be rightfully 'changed' to their personal philosophies.

Why would any American question anti-American values in the Obama House?

Why would anyone have a sign comparing what is happening in our country, as Obama builds an Americorps army and takes over banks, Car companies, media, Newspapers, Internet, Education, Health care, (etc.) too Hitler's socialist/fascist take over of Germany?
Why would you dare protest that?
Why would you even think it?

Having said that - does one think for a moment that strike busting tactics wouldn't be employed by infiltrating crowds with trained sign carrying agitators?

These authors write- It is so appalling that signs compare Obama to Hitler or the holocaust...where were these disgusted partisans when Bush was compared to Hitler? (it only took me moments to copy and paste together these Bush google images)

The hypocrisy of this liberal biased media, who scout the crowd looking for offensive signs to try to make a deliberative point that, see, what we have here is a crowd of extremists, is pathetic.
Where were they - their disgust and condemnation- when the signs called for the death of a president?

There never were any apologies from Democrats for their people protesting with signs such as these above. Yet they demand Michele Bachmann apologize that someone (not hundreds) - someone- showed up with a sign showing an image comparing Socialist Health care to the Holocaust.

Why is there always a double standard with liberals?

The outrage directed at a few non-approved signs, that politicians may not even have seen, is not the real issue with these poison keyboard engineers. The issue with these misleading media types is to negatively 'label' people who gather together and minimize context with smearing attacks to obscure the actual issues.

Crowd control. Association guilt.

Alinsky’s RULE Number 12(13): "Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it."

These signs are NOT the issue.

I want to remind anyone reading this (that disagrees ) of just one of Obama's statements that has people carrying signs and trying to warn you of what is to come for your 'post-existing' conditions:
Obama on brokering treatment options: "There is going to have to be a very difficult democratic conversation that takes place... The chronically ill and those toward the end of their lives are accounting for potentially 80 percent of the total health- care bill out here."

Yet anyone with a "Save Grandma" sign is ridiculed and called a whack job?

Blind, fool, or needing a tax dictionary, to describe what IS is, Obama wants to have a required cost effective democratic conversation with you, or yours, and the billing burden of actually providing ANY health care when you'll need it most.

The Stimulus Bill has already provided funds and staffed the democratic distributive jury that will decide whether you fit in Obam's 80% bracket.

If you can't figure out what That above Obama statement means without reading or understanding a single line of these ration-controlled health manifestos then get ready to go home, shut up, and take your pill.

This Health care Bill is a mandated unconstitutional government control of our lives, liberty, choice and privacy.
I say Hell NO!

If that resisting imagery somehow makes one an extremist then I'm your huckleberry.


Saturday, November 7, 2009

Exclusive: Interview with Rep. Joe Wilson on Health Care

Exclusive: Interview with Rep. Joe Wilson on Health Care

by Washington News Observer

Today, tea party and other conservative activists are holding rallies in Washington, DC as part of the “House Calls on Congress” event. Big Government has a reporter covering the events and will have a report later today. Earlier this week, Washington News Observer sat down with South Carolina Congressman Joe Wilson to discuss the current landscape for health care legislation.

Friday, November 6, 2009

Michele Bachmann Rallies thousands Protesting "KILL the BILL!"

Mark Levin And 20-40,000 At US Capitol Protest Obamacare 11/5/2009

Jon Voight on Obama Socialist Destruction of America

Thursday, November 5, 2009

Obama Expands Government with Bribes-Threats-Extortion

And where are our representatives?
There is a poor connection somewhere.
I just don't see them on the floor shouting "can you hear me now".

This is an older story from Judge Andrew Napolitano going back into September and heated up again in April.
As of yesterday the Obama Admin. is still trying to force all banks into his pool of government control with threats and extortion.

Now they want to go after 'wages' and bonuses.

If 'control' wasn't clear, when Obama refused to except TARP funds BACK from Banks who had taken money, it should be clear now that he has his sights set on dictating to banks who never took a dime of Obama dollars.
Don't fool yourself, these companies are Obama owned - or, have you received a dividend check lately?

Our Government Engaged In EXTORTION With Our Banks!
By Judge Andrew Napolitano
FOX News Senior Judicial Analyst

The Federal government committed extortion and they’re not being held accountable. What’s next? Listen to this: I recently met with the Chair and CEO of one of the country’s top 10 bank holding companies. His bank is worth in excess of $250 billion, has no bad debt, no credit default swaps, no liquidity problems, and no sub prime loans. He told me that he and others were forced by Treasury and FDIC threats to take TARP funds, even though he did not want or need them.

There is simply no authority in the U.S. Constitution for Congress to exercise the level of control it now seeks over private industry.

The FDIC — with Treasury backing — threatened to conduct public audits of his bank unless his board created and issued a class of stock for the Feds to buy. The audit, which he is confident his bank would survive, would cost it millions in employee time, bad press, and consequent lost business.

He pleaded with the Feds to leave his successful bank alone. He begged his board to let him tell the Feds to take a hike. But they gave in. The Feds are now just a tiny shareholder, but want to begin asserting more and more control. This is a classic extortion: Controlling someone’s free will by threatening to perform a lawful act. (Blackmail is the threat is to perform an unlawful act in order to control someone else’s free will.) There are no exceptions in the statutes prohibiting extortion for government persons

This happened in September 2008, but the demands for more control are more recent. It sounds to me like Paulson, Geithner, Bernanke, and Sheila Blair have all read a biography of Benito Mussolini. I guess they skipped the last chapter.

There is simply no authority in the U.S. Constitution for Congress to exercise the level of control it now seeks over private industry. In fact, this level of control will wind up costing the businesses that took TARP (voluntarily or involuntarily) money since they will lose key employees who will go to work elsewhere and because the reporting requirements will take time and time is money. The Constitution basically says that if the government wants to take time or freedom or money from someone or something, it must sue for it. It cannot just give itself the authority to do so via legislation.

Our liberties are slipping away right before our eyes.

Obama's UnConstitutional BRIBES to Harness the Education System

Every day I wake up to find the formation of the Obama nation moving more pieces into place for end around Congress and Constitutional take over issues.

Using taxpayer dollars Obama is dangling a 5 billion dollar stimulus bribe in 10-20 States to follow the Obama Education plan.

The $5-billion grant fund has been titled “Race to the Top,” and the money is part of Obama’s $787-billion economic stimulus package. States must compete for the money, which Education Secretary Arne Duncan will dispense at Obama’s pleasure with no Congressional control. Only 10 to 20 states are expected to actually receive some of the grant money.

Obama promoted the competitive grants while visiting a Wisconsin middle school. He was trying to influence a November 5 vote by state legislators about linking teacher performance ratings to student test scores. This effectively links a teacher’s pay to how well his students perform, based on what's being tested. Wisconsin lawmakers are expected to lift a ban on establishing this connection, presumably so the state can qualify for some of Obama’s grant money.

The Obama administration has said that refusing to link teacher performance ratings to student test scores would lessen a state’s chance of receiving federal funds. In Wisconsin, Obama wrapped the bribe he is offering in high-sounding language about the importance of education.

Any State who doesn't implement the Obama plan lessens chance of receiving funds- otherwise known as, No you Won't.

Teachers will be obligated to please the Obama people or be denied extended funds.

Keep in mind the news you have heard in the past years- whereby the hammer used to force participation in whatever plan the Feds want compliance in is always a threat to withdraw funds. Accept the bribe and comply or suffer punishment.

In this bearded Obama puzzle once you have accepted Fed funds, like a bank, they own you and become your voice by taking your voice away. And much like the Banks we have heard about - once they own you - they begin dictating what your policies will be- how much pay you will receive - who will be hired to replace who they fire...and much like the banks once they have their claws in, they turn their sights on the rest of the non government controlled.

In the recent exposures of this Administrations in your face maneuvers to control every sector of industry and private life 'changes' one has to wonder when it will 'force' non participating States into the Obama program.

Let's not forget who wrote this APPOLO Stimulus Bill from which this 5 Billion comes from. Communist Van Jones. Terrorist Jeffrey Jones.

Anything coming out of this Stimulus Bill must be held suspect and looked into. Anti-Americans writing policy for Americans has to have their agenda funded.

Re-education is a big part of their agenda.

Hitching the education system to the Obama Marxist wagon through play for pay tactics is another slick monetary enticement to surrender to Obama control.

This kind of bribery is an unconstitutional exercise of executive branch power over the states. The Congress is supposed to have the purse strings of the federal government, not the President or his staff members. There is no authorization in the Constitution for the federal government either to take taxpayer money, to borrow money, or to simply print money and use it to bribe states into compliance with the President’s wishes.

Wednesday, November 4, 2009

Obama turns back on Pro-Democracy Again

First, Obama AIDS in Honduras Dictator to be returned to power by cutting off all AID to Honduras thereby forcing Their Congress to re vote their position - then rather than Aid Iranian freedom fighters with support, if only in words that matter, he turns his back on Iranian Pro-Democracy demonstrators in Iran. Again.

As Obama can't seem to make up his mind to support the troops that are presently in Afghanistan he seems to have little problem supporting American hating dictator regimes.

"Death to America" fanatics, today, celebrate the 30 years of Islamic oppression and take over of the US Embassy and imprisonment of US citizens as Carter sat on his undecided butt. Thousands of pro-democracy anti-Ahmedinejad protesters showed up and were attacked as they chanted "Death to Dictators"... and they had a message to Obama that they also chanted, "Obama, Obama — either you’re with them or you’re with us."

Obama doesn't want the dictators to conclude that these freedom from tyranny protesters are teabag mobs or Western influenced AstroTurf agitators and so has decided that non-support is the best message to send to the dictators.

Strength, might, and Right, through disarmament of encouraging words.

We wouldn't want to use words that the clerical regime could use against us, were the words of purple heart Kerry.

Accusing the U.S. of interference is a rant from Ahmedinejad anyway, like, there was never a Holocaust...but we will 'change' their minds to both by remaining silent.

Under any circumstances the Islamic regime will say whatever it takes to fire up their base.

Outbursts will only allow the status quo to continue with additional strength, says Obama.

Change won't come from the Top down!

Ironic, let us all begin to be fearful of the words dictators use against us was a point I was going to make against Kerry's argument...though it hasn't silenced American protesters it sure has been an Obama troops weapon.

As Obama uses tax payer dollars to fly around firing up his own base in '09 elections, and our generals still await a decision to support our troops, Obama dithers again rather than promote democracy and lend support to freedom seeking people.

"Obama, Obama — either you’re with them or you’re with us."

Obama has concluded that what the oppressed peoples of Iran need to do is to settle their own problems.

The poor chanting Iranian people have got it all wrong since the big effectiveness change in America.
Obama people don't support or encourage liberty and freedom -
If you're not with Obama - You need to change. mmm - mmm- mmmm

"Transparency Like You’ve Never Seen Before” The White House Visitor Log

The White House website for it's visitors list says:

"Transparency Like You’ve Never Seen Before

Almost choked on my Pepsi when I read that. My monitor is a dripping mess.

Another Obama misleading lie.

These visitor logs have been requested through the Freedom of Information Act for months and months...and Obama has refused to turn them over citing Presidential private privilege.
I won't go into the history of this bogus transparency propaganda -I'll just direct you to the stories already written.

Obama refuses access.

As with everything about Obama you must ask yourself WHY?

Why hide who you're meeting?

It is difficult to believe this is a full list for so many months of records of visitation when it is reported that thousands visit the WH each month.

The story for me is the names on the list and the Obama transparent response.

One sees the names of Bill Ayers and Jeremiah Wright on the visitors list- yet the WH says they are NOT THE William Ayers and THE Jeremiah Wright - .


Of course there is the Nazi collaborator and anti-American Obama Banker George Soros on the list.

SEIU, children of the corn branch, Andy Stern, on list 22 times - Big peoples Union making 'progress'.

Also reported is that domestic terrorist Jeffrey Jones is on the list having visited 7 times...that one I have to say is probably not a correct assumption by people...the Middle initial on the list for Jeffrey is "A."...
Jeffrey Jones, architect of the failing APPOLO Stimulus package ( written along with Obama ousted Communist Czar Van Jones) has a middle initial of "C." - for not Karl...Carl.

Haven't had time to look at other names on list but since the collective birds of a feather cluster together - I wouldn't be surprised by who's who on the list and their collaborative links to engineering transformational versions of unconstitutional justice.

Obama should rename the log- The Reverse Engineers of American Freedoms list.

Monday, November 2, 2009

Health care: Crown jewel of Socialism - Cradel to Grave Government Control

Michele Bauchmann calls for ralley Thursday, Nov. 5th, at noon, at the Capitol, to protest this Unconstitutional health care Bill that the House plans on voting on friday.

If you can be there - please do so.

Interview On Health Care

Legacy of Community Organizers: Stealing Elections

Will Corzine Allies Steal the Election in New Jersey? ACORN, Dirty Tricks and Absentee Ballot Fraud

by Capitol Confidential see this article and people comments @ Big

New Jersey Governor Jon Corzine is locked in the political fight of his life. With just hours left before voting, polls show a neck-and-neck race between Corzine and GOP candidate Chris Christie, with Independent candidate Chris Daggett pulling significant support. Obama and VP Biden are making last ditch pitches for the embattled governor. But evidence is building that Corzine’s campaign may see its only salvation is in rigging the election.

The first sign is a straight-up dirty trick. Daggett’s run for office is certainly convenient for Corzine, as he will help split any anti-Corzine vote. And, as a Corzine political appointee, one wonders if his candidacy wasn’t a set up to begin with. Now, in the final days of the campaign, it appears state democrats are paying for robo calls supporting Independent Chris Daggett. First reported here, the robo calls attack Christie (but not Corzine) and promote Daggett. At the end of the call, it is mentioned that the calls are paid for by a “project of the NJSDC.” No idea what that acronym stands for, but New Jersey State Democratic Committee, isn’t too big of a stretch. More interesting is the fact that the return number on the calls is the same number that was used to promote Maryland Governor Martin O’Malley’s election in closing days of the 2006 race.

More telling that the fix is in, however, is the sudden appearance of ACORN on the scene. Not by name, mind you, as their reputation is so tarnished that even New Jersey Democrats don’t want to be associated with them. No, in New Jersey ACORN sought cover behind its big brother, SEIU, specifically SEIU Local 32BJ.

The political director for the SEIU local is Peter Colavito. Just last year, he was ACORN’s political director in New York, working directly under Bertha Lewis, ACORN’s CEO and co-chair of ACORN-backed Working Families Party. He was, and remains, a top official and board member of the Working Families Party in New York. In fact, his wife is currently an employee of the Working Families Party. Corzine has made much of his endorsement by the SEIU local, failing to mention the union’s deep ties to both ACORN and its Working Families Party in New York.

These ties are starting to appear, however. GOP officials recently received a phone tip from a hospital in Newark, reporting that people in ACORN t-shirts were in the facility signing up and collecting absentee ballots. New Jersey law allows anyone to take up to 10 absentee ballots at a time. The tipster reported seeing individuals in the ACORN shirts entering the hospital with blank absentee ballots and leaving with completed ballots.

There are reports out of Camden, New Jersey that voters are discovering that absentee ballots have already been submitted under their name. They did not authorize these ballots. Early reports suggested that the number of absentee ballots ‘requested’ in Camden city is higher than in any previous election. This will no doubt spark confusion on election day.

Possibly anticipating this confusion, the state Democratic Committee recently sent a letter to the Secretary of State, arguing that any absentee ballot that is rejected should still be counted as a “provisional” vote. The letter complained that almost 3,000 absentee ballots had already been rejected “solely on the basis of a comparison of their signature to the signature on record.” Solely? If the signature of the voter doesn’t match the signature on the ballot, is there really a reason to look at anything else? The letter from the state Democrats suggests that election officials should simply verify that the address on the absentee ballot matches the address on record. Right, and my bank should go ahead and cash any suspicious check as long as the address on the check matches my home address.

The best hope here is that Christie wins by enough of a margin that these dirty tricks are moot. As they say in sports, put enough points on the board and the refs can’t steal it from you.

[Ed Note: Big Government will be working closely on election day with Election Journal and its army of citizen journalists and videographers to document any instances of voter fraud in New Jersey. We welcome the help of readers in New Jersey. If you would like to volunteer to help maintain the integrity of the democratic process, please send an email to You can use this same email to report any voting irregularities you witness on Tuesday. Also, please send in any of your own documentary video of problems at polling places. Big Media may ignore stories of voter fraud, but together we can shine the critical light on it.]

Sunday, November 1, 2009

Imperial Presidency: A Total Gangster Government

Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) speaking on the House floor: Now we've moved into the realm of gangster government.