Well, forwarned is forearmed...
It is reported that Google has commenced a silencing treatment upon Blogspoters.
I have set up a back-up site in case this one goes down @ obamacom.wordpress.com (there's nothing on it yet - just a tsun sue precaution)
It seems that Obama's fightthefears web terroists have started a new game called report negative Obama sites, and positive Hillary sites, to Google as "spam sites."
What a bunch of nice untiy 'uniters', eh?
So rather than investigate these sites first for an unknown reported violation, google (who contributed over 370k in bundeled dollars to Obama) has shut down these Just say No, No to Obama, NoBama, sites with emails to the authors that they will be under investigation for 'spamming' - probably to be released unharmed no later than November 5, 2008, would be my 5 dollar guess.
Now, of course this could just be google’s faulty sytem that allows for people with genuine knowlegable site content to be attacked and harrassed, but google knows this is a problem. Google has a history of censoring and the records show their moneys on Obama. So what'sa simple pinko hunter gona think?
Co-incidence my hide- It's one or the other.
To anyone with a Blogspot website I encourage you to make copies of your site and probably be prepared to move it.
Most sites still load up but the authors can no longer write new Obama / Hillary / content.
Google also now owns youtube and is responsible for all of these informative Obama videos that keep disappearing off the web too.
My advice? When you find one you like and embed/use/post/ it somewhere - Know that it probably will google-vanish quick as an Obama pledge.
If you like a particular video and think it is important information then make your own copy and upload it to a place like photobucket as your, or the web's, back-up.
For a much more in depth insight on this story see bloggasm.
I gottah go read up on how communism starts - I believe it gets a threshold thru suppressed votes - censored media - bludgeoning oppossition - and idol worshipping?
Sunday, June 29, 2008
Well, forwarned is forearmed...
Saturday, June 28, 2008
Hillary Clinton has not formally released her pledged delegates yet, but the DNC in another sweep to smack down any discontent to their selected nominee, Barack Hussein Obama, has voted to remove Debra Bartoshevich, a Wisconsin Hillary Delegate, from the Democratic National Convention in Denver this summer.
Debra Bartoshevich, said she planned to vote for Clinton at the convention, but in an Obama-McCain matchup in November, “I will not be voting for Obama. I will cast my vote for John McCain."
“I just feel you need to have somebody who has experience with foreign matters.”
She said a series of controversial Obama associations, including but not limited to the Rev. Jeremiah Wright and Chicago developer Tony Rezko, reflected poorly on his judgment. And she echoed the complaints of many of Clinton’s most ardent supporters that Clinton was treated unfairly in the nominating process and by the party.
In ObamaLand, freedom of speech and choice are quickly dealt with.
They 'voted' to replace her.
Five Bucks says she wil not be replaced by a Hillary Convention supporter.
I'd say the lady needs a re-instatement petition of her own right about now.
In one fell swoop this NeObama party has taken away one of Hillary's votes and thus given it, again, to Obama with a warning to any other HC supporters.
Nothing new here I guess. Especially as it's the scuttlebut that The unprincipled Convention isn't even going to allow a roll call anyway - out of fear that their fair-scared selection could yet be out voted.
The stage seems to be set that should anyone further question oBAMA'S racist associations, criminal friendships, party chicanery, and under da air-bus judgments (gottah make that bus bigger as we go along now) that they are not only not Welcomed in the party, but they will be eliminated.
The Republicans are already being labeled racist to try to squelch some of the upcoming rehashing of unanswered controversies already discovered and brought out by the - then- hateful racist democrats. (Obama's peoples words - not mine) That was then, this is now...
It's a no-brainer why Obama is frightened to appear at Town Hall meetings, with Senator Mccain, after so many people are now more fully armed with accumilated ammunition of information that the REAL unvetted Barack Obama would have to answer in an informal, unscripted, non-media adoring, forum.
Obama said he'd meet anytime, anywhere; and in his Book he stated how much he just looooooved Town Hall meetings - (refind his quote)-
Obama is avoiding Town Hall meetings now.
This same fear of being 'outted' keeps the Leaders adjusting the outcome of the coming Convention so no questions are allowed and no descenting votes are taken.
After this choreographed Unity -*in Unity*- people are going to have to understand that, barring some miracle like Obama shoutin Yeee- haaaw, that the cards have been dealt from a stacked deck and you are going to be on your own now to Stop Obama.
Debra, is not alone in being penalised free expression and choice at the DNC's, "I am the one you and I have been waiting for," Convention.
There are reported to be Millions in the DNC's disenfranchised party who believe Obama is nothing more than a Chicago snake-oiled BOa constrictor that has squeezed every ounce of democrasy out of their party and turned its foundational substance into an immoral undemocratic mush.
Will their voices be allowed to be heard in Denver?
Ask the, "Man who Unites". . .
I applaud Debra Bartoshevich, a true American, for standing up for her Country's ideals first, and the DNC-party's unqualified bHo selection, second.
Friday, June 27, 2008
I'ma little late, and behind on this News, but there are so many ObamaGates to research that I just can't keep up.
There is mucho communication on the net right now, with great info, regarding Barack's Birth Certificate (or the CLB) taken from Obama's own UnSmear ME website and it's probable forgery details being pointed out.
[I will add some of those investigative Links here: later]
One surely has to ask what is on the real deal? And why does Obama feel he has to hide behind, what looks to be, a deliberate forgery?
Besides the registrars signature, and the embossed State Stamp, that are missing on this paper, I really only have one question for Barry.
Since when would a legitimate 1961 Certification of Live Birth state on it:
There is no such Race, Barry.
Thursday, June 26, 2008
The Second Amendment Clingers Win, Obama the Ban-man Loses.
A divided U.S. Supreme Court, in 5-4 ruling, ruled for the first time that the Constitution protects individual gun rights, striking down the District of Columbia's handgun ban and raising questions about weapons restrictions elsewhere. (Such as in Chicago)
"The enshrinement of constitutional rights necessarily takes certain policy choices off the table," Justice Antonin Scalia wrote for the majority in the final decision of the court's nine-month term. "These include the absolute prohibition of handguns held and used for self-defense in the home."
McCain said in a statement "Unlike the elitist view that believes Americans cling to guns out of bitterness, today's ruling recognizes that gun ownership is a fundamental right -- sacred, just as the right to free speech and assembly."
Where is Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois, on this issue?
It really depends on who he is talking too, and what year it is.
In a IVI-IPO General Candidate Questionnaire that Obama filled out prior to his run for Senate:
question 35.) Do you support state legislation to:
a.ban the manufacture,sale and possession of handguns? (Obama's answer:) Yes.
Today Obama said he agrees with the court's "overall reasoning" and the Washington gun ban probably "overshot the runway."
"I have said consistently that I believe the Second Amendment is an individual right," Obama told Fox Business News, referring to the constitutional amendment that grants Americans the right to bear arms.
"And that was the essential decision that the Supreme Court came down on. And it also recognized that even though we have an individual right to bear arms, that right can be limited by sensible, reasonable gun laws." he said.
Yesterday when asked his opinion he wouldn't answer. He defered to tommorow's decission. Wait and see. Today, he's back to individual rights.
It's hard to figure him out. It was only back in Feburary that he said there were 2 conflicting traditions - but he believed that the DC gun ban was "constitutional".
Obama has simply supplied more good speak for a candidate running a national campaign, for today.
So what did Obama actually say in Local Chicago Politics where there is also an inner city gun ban where his 'reasonable and sensible gun ban laws' have left guns to be only in the hands of criminals? (See Chicago crime rate to see how well Obam's policies have straightened that cities woes out- and let's apply them Nationaly - Yes we can!)
From Obama's SENATE website in 2006 on social changes and guns:
"Solving these problems will require changes in government policy, but it will also require changes in hearts and a change in minds. I believe in keeping guns out of our inner cities, and that our leaders must say so in the face of the gun manufacturers' lobby."
Yes, certainly, there can be, should be, and already are sensible, reasonal gun laws. But it probably needs repeating;
Obama: "I believe in keeping guns out of our inner cities".
The problem with Obama's 'constitutional' belief, pre-Supreme Court ruling, is that the DC handgun ban was not a regulation or a restriction of guns -- it was a ban.
The very same ban Obama supported in DC and in Chicago and also supported in the Reverend Pfleger grassroot gunban pulpit.
Obama's voting record is consistently anti-gun legislation.
If it weren't for the Supreme Court today, Obama would revert back to his previous statements that he felt the DC hand-gun ban was 'constitutional' - and look, the Supreme Court agrees with me; and my consistent record.
So we can see the re-handwriting on the wall. In an Obama Supreme Court, through his own appointments, the outcome today could probably have been 5-4 to require, hummm, reasonable interpetational changes to the heart of the Second Amendment.
When Obama made the statement of people 'clinging to their guns' it should be much clearer now that his true policy, regarding clutching their gun rights, is too require government changes to ban the clingers individual rights to own guns.
But what did he possibly mean by ..."but it will also require changes in hearts and a change in minds."
For this we have to examine Obama's views on constitutional law.
(btw, some bloggers, and Fox News just today, called Barack a "Constitutional Law Professor"...another Obama LIE- Obama was Never a "Professor". He was, however, a 4th tier Law Lecturer)
An Obama requirement for changing hearts and minds and Supreme Court appointments:
Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., said, "The role of a justice is to favor the weak over the strong."
In the most difficult cases, the determining factor is not what the law in question says, or what the Constitution says. In those difficult cases, what matters is "what is in the judge's heart.
In ObamaLand (have'- have-nots' philosophy) the Law and the Constitution do not matter.
I was just curious. How many other types of things has Mr. Obama said, "I have said consistently that ..."
Wow! pretty consistently-inconsistent changes acomin' our way...
Wednesday, June 25, 2008
Ali Abunimah on Barack Obama and Israel
What was left unsaid on this short News clip?
by Ali Abunimah The Electronic Intifada, 4 March 2007
"How Obama learned to love Israel"
"...Over the years since I first saw Obama speak I met him about half a dozen times, often at Palestinian and Arab-American community events in Chicago including a May 1998 community fundraiser at which Edward Said was the keynote speaker. In 2000, when Obama unsuccessfully ran for Congress I heard him speak at a campaign fundraiser hosted by a University of Chicago professor. On that occasion and others Obama was forthright in his criticism of US policy and his call for an even-handed approach to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict.
The last time I spoke to Obama was in the winter of 2004 at a gathering in Chicago's Hyde Park neighborhood. He was in the midst of a primary campaign to secure the Democratic nomination for the United States Senate seat he now occupies. But at that time polls showed him trailing.
As he came in from the cold and took off his coat, I went up to greet him. He responded warmly, and volunteered, "Hey, I'm sorry I haven't said more about Palestine right now, but we are in a tough primary race. I'm hoping when things calm down I can be more up front." He referred to my activism, including columns I was contributing to the The Chicago Tribune critical of Israeli and US policy, "Keep up the good work!"
It is just such disengenious sneaky character that causes both sides of the Palestine Israeli communities to question and distrust Obama's verbalized policies. On one day he is for Israel support when addressing the jewish community, the next day he's for backing off of his statements with "uh, um, what I meant was..." in reponse to outraged Arab communities. He has even got Gadaffi in an agitated state.
Barack Knows that he simply cannot be 'up front' and get elected.
It's probably at times like this that Obama' wishes he could conduct his speeches in secret - or at least send ambassadors of sneak-speak off to places like Canada with a 'wink and a nod' NAFTA style.
SHhhhhh! We have to say this now - but we'll talk 'up front' after the elections.
This is an immature, manipulating, dishonest, and dangerous man.
The untrustworthy character flaws just keep surfacing.
The two-faces of Obama is also why Israel can't chance an Obama Presidency and is conducting those practice bomber missions against Iran right now.
The Obama turmoil is showing dire consequences, in Party, Country, and the World.
One thing we can probably be sure of is that when things calm down Obama can probably be more up front...unless he has to take a side on an issue!
Obama's "I Love My Country" General Election Ad -
Note: 48 seconds into the Ad -
In this "I Love my Country" Ad (viewed extensively in Wisconsin) Obama states, ""I passed laws moving people from welfare to work, cut taxes for working families and ...extended health care for wounded troops who'd been neglected." (Public Law 110-181) .
Senator, sigh, Senator -
Listen, when are you going to learn that because of your huge list of 'mis-statements' (I'm being MEDIA-sweety-KIND here to you) people are going to have to check for misappropriation of "words", for verification, anytime something comes out of that evocative yap trap of yours.
Senator, according to the US Senate Roll call Votes 110th Congress - 2nd Session on Passage of the Bill (H.R.4986 ), into Public Law 110-181, the Votes were recorded as such:
Not Voting 6
scrolling down the voting member list for (H.R.4986) PL 110-181, we see...
Obama (D-IL), Not Voting
Oooooh No! Not Again!?!
Distortion Disclaimer: This is Not how Senator Obama(D) conducts his campaign! This is not the video camera-man that he thought he knew, and he will be replaced immediately!
This pandering propaganda projection, of Obama's Own self-image of honorable patriotism, by using a 'wounded troops' law, that he actually didn't even bother to Vote for, is dispicable.
He also had nothing whatsoever to do with the "passed law moving people from welfare to work."
The only thing Obama has extended is the growing list of BS he smears across this country that he says he loves so much.
Can you trust this man to be honest with you in the White House?
Tuesday, June 24, 2008
Ok, let me break some of this blogs content down into more readable format.
Obama claims that "not once" in his conversations with Wright had he heard Wright talk about any ethnic group "in derogatory terms."
He has repeated his denials many times, in different ways and means.
To Anderson Cooper he would say: "You know, I confess that I did not hear about this until-- uh, um, uh, --until I started running for president."
Another proven lie of course.
But here is an Obama lie I wrote about back in April and it's particular complication does not appear to be clarified anywhere else on the net still.
In his Book , "Dreams of my father", Obama tells of an 1990 Wright sermon that preached of a world of white greed, "a world where cruise ships throw away more food than most residents of Port-au-Prince see in a year, where white folks' greed runs a world in need, apartheid in one hemisphere, apathy in another hemisphere...
And so it went, a meditation on a fallen world. While the boys next to me doodled on their church bulletin, Reverend Wright spoke of Sharpesville and Hiroshima, the callousness of policy makers in the White House and in the State House."
So Obama tells us in Wrights sermon that his pastor talked in derogatory terms regarding "white folks", Hiroshima, and denouncements against the USA. (In front of children too)
Now, Here's the funny thing though ---
In reading Reverend Wrights 1990 sermon "The Audacity of Hope" you will note that there doesn't seem to be any mention at all of greedy white folks or cruise ships...or Port-au-Prince or Sharpesville or the White House. Close as it comes in the sermon is mentioning 'apartheid' and 'white on rice".
I suppose he'd say it must have been a different sermon, but then he would fall into the trap of acknowledging and hearing these type of sermons many times- but, of course, remember now, he didn't agree with them.
Or, Obama would have to admit that - Port-au-Prince, greedy white folks, cruise ships... Sharpesville and the callouse White House were OBAMA's own words and thoughts as he took pen to paper. Words he knew would be excepted in the ingratiating invention of Obama, the Local Chicago Candidate.
Let me just clarify, since I continue to read bloggers elsewhere, and the News Media, write or say, that Reverend Wright said these things in his sermon.
Read the sermon.
Nowhere in the sermon does Wright use the words... greedy white folks, or cruise ships...or Port-au-Prince or Sharpesville, or references to the uncaring callouse White House.
If Wright didn't actually say these words in the sermon, (derogatory words that Obama's never heard Wright speak until he began his run for president) then who did?
These are Obama's words. Obam's thoughts.
Barack's own USofA reflections written in his book about that darned ole indifferent unfeeling America and..."greedy white folks."
Obama is quick to blame others, and deny, but he is not innocent of racism. The only things Obama appears to know how to 'change' are facts, his mind, and the truth.
Has Obama really showed us any change in the way politics works, or has he done whomever it takes to win?
Barack Obama made a pact with John McCain that, if the two were to be their party’s nominees, each would accept public financing for the general election.
But, Barack discovered that those Sorros & Arab fueled boilerrooms could keep the internet paypal donations accumilating much more lucretively than taking the mere 84 mil public financing, draft beer budget, that he had agreed too.
So, Obama broke his word.
To most people, in this country, a man's word is a pledge of honor, and a pact is an oath to it.
If Senator(D)Obama can't even keep his word ,before being DNC selected to office, what can one expect when he takes an oath to it?
Saturday, June 21, 2008
The News and blogs are ablaze with this latest Obamania/c "arrogance".
Yesterday, Obama displayed one of his ego-class changes for the American people. His very own, v2.0, facsimile of a Presidential Seal! I say Version 2.0 because I wrote some notes up on his Version 1.0 over 3 months ago. (See my write-up, at Obama's Presidential Seal?)
In this one, the shield is replaced with his Logo...tiny steps. Tick - Tick-
What's next? Obama's nose to the sky Leninist style headshot Poses draped on our Government buildings? Mother Farrakhan Uniforms?
"Vero Possumus"; Latin for, "Yes we can"?? or, Very Pompouspossum?
It's all about Obama. I'd bet the Obverse says...
UPDATE: So they Admit it was a "SEAL"...6/23/08
Barack Obama’s presidential campaign is retiring a presidential seal that made its debut at a Chicago event last week.
“It was a one-time seal for a one-time use,” Obama spokeswoman Jen Psaki said.
Yeah, right!... a one-time deal for the seal.
And, there goes the ole' posthumousoppossum under the bus like a flattened road killed hubcap.
Come on now, Who Knew? Dang it, and I only won 50 cents in the pool. Off by 3 hours!
I'd say the definition of may be illegal is pretty much clarified by their admission of - "It was"...
Remember to check out the New hcfjm.com Info. Archive for all past posted hcfjm ObamaSInfo.
Thursday, June 19, 2008
I recieved this e-mail (below) yesterday asking if I would help spread this idea and, or, publish it on my blog.
I went to look at the email writers site, and this old 'thug' decided that every idea, that will help keep this Country from the Obama Abomination of Marxist 'change' and it's radical UnAmerican take-over of the DNP and of it's peoples rights, is worthy of all efforts. -gb
John's idea too Hillary Supporters in answer to the requests from the DNC & Obama people for your money and support. (John, I edited it slightly and added link/s)
I hope this helps to get your message out, John. Good Luck!
Florida and Michigan peoples could tear their check copy in half. Send one half of zero to each address.
Remember in November.
"I am confident I will get her votes if I'm the nominee. It's not clear she would get the (92% race-based) votes I got if she were the nominee." ~ Barack Obama, February 1, 2008
...and for those peoples coming here from Ed's, See this hcfjm Compilation link . Hope this temp. hcfjm archive helps you to find your comments 'information' easier. -gb
Monday, June 16, 2008
The question of weather Barack Hussien Obama is a Muslim, ever was a Muslim, is a good or bad guy brand of Muslim, is still haunting Barack Obama.
Obama has set up a website War room to counter what he calls e-mail lies and smears. Here he continues to deny that he was ever a Muslim, or that he ever went to a Muslim school. His dishonesty continues by using semantics and misdirection.
There is much information and photos regarding Obama dressed in Muslim gear. There is even more information, in Obama's own words, that belies his latest propaganda efforts.
Although the Obama Muslim-dressed images and the rebuked story go to the credibility of Obama, his integrity, honesty, and character, the media not only dismissed the images but helped Obama keep the story buried by accusing Hillary of cheap shots of racist, divisive, and shameful fear & smear tactics.
It got to the point where no information about Obama could be stated without a legitimate debate being silenced completely by using the 'racist label'.
Keep in mind, as much as Obama seems to want to distance himself from a Muslim branding, it is not so much a question of showing that Obama is a good , or bad guy type of Muslim. The problem is the 'image' of the brand. Or in today's view if there is such a thing, at all, of a good verses bad Muslim, given World Headlines of fundamental Islamic atrocities. This inclusive association is one Obama seems to fear most.
What is the issue is that Obama is a liar. To be, or not to be a Muslim is not the primary question.
Obama has told us in his first Book, that he went to a Muslim school and that he studied his Koranic verses. Period.
There is no argument that Obama can use to dispel his personally written disclosures.
Therefore He must recruit those who don't care what he has actually done or said, or those who haven't done their Obama homework and believe he is being honest with them, to spread the disinformation from his Help-UnSmear-Me website. He counts on these supporters to dispel his dubious background for him.
In Obama's covert denials he (surrounds) the truth with words that allow him to portray an obscured truthful statement as being a lie that must be dismissed.
His anti-Smear Troopers have declared, Obama did not go to a Wahhabi Muslim school...- and or -
Senator Obama did not go to a madrassa Muslim school.
The sentence stated as written, for that time period, is maybe the truth you see, or perhaps a non radical version of a Muslim schooling truth. These Obama statements are written in such a manner that his uninformed readers will never recognize the trees through the forest of camouflage.
When the Obama lies are repeated enough times, and it gets repeated by enough emailed peoples and their Links, well, then Obama's version (4.0) goes right up to the TOP of google's Page Ranking, effectively burying those other accurate and truthful "OBAMA Muslim" type of word searches.
As one can see, when printed in this way, Senator Obama did not go to a
madrassa Muslim school, then this is The continuing Obama LIE he is still avoiding telling the truth about with his word tricks.
How easy it can be to decieve in the tangled webs we weave.
Patrilinealy speaking, Obama was actually naturally Born a Muslim of thine father.
Muslim or nay, it is not the Muslim question that should be haunting Obama, it is the Obama deceit.
Lest we not forget that any e-mails, or articles written, going out declaring Obama to be a Muslim, practicing or not, were generated by Obama and his own spokespersons way back when as they were denying that Obama was a Muslim, had ever been a Muslim, had ever gone to a Muslim school.
The facts, in Obama's own published words, showed this to be untrue.
So, people responded with their own research and providing the truth of the matter.
The Campaign, who apparently had not 'vetted' their Boss, came out several times to 'change' their stories in the past. Today, the Obama War room continues the illusion of 'change' and disinformation.
In Obama's Fighting the Smears website he asks you to Upload to us your family and friends email addresses ... the entire address book will do just fine. Thank You. (paraphrased)
With this, the bringin' a gun to a knife fight Obama webBrains (fighting against concerned Americans, with all their flaws,) will proceed to viraly infest and infect the net with unsolicited spam emails to all listed addresses with the Obama confabulated words of victimization and <sarcasm>truth </sarcasm>...and Please, don't forget to give us your email password so that we can generate the email content, and then we'll send it too them for you...this is just a small example of what we can do for you in the future of 'change' so that you won't have to do it for yourself. Cool, eh?
Oh, and Speakin' of 'change', if you have any, can you send it to us post haste. Just remember, "Yes, we can!"
Any Obama supporters who have been dumb enough to give out their password will probably Vote for Obama without hesitation despite any amount of exposure of Obama's masterful equivocations.
Meanwhile, back at the mosque...
In other News - Obama's over the pond half brother believes Obama will be a good Muslim to the Jewish people. (None of that bad person kind of Muslim despite Islamic sunnahs like -Get out ye from behind that tree! - and kill them where you find them, sayeth Mohammed, while conquering non-believers on his mystical horse, Baraq ...)
Malik Obama confirms his half-brother Barack grew up a Muslim
As the Jerusalem Post reports, "Barack Obama's half brother Malik said Thursday that if elected his brother will be a good president for the Jewish people, despite his Muslim background. In an interview with Army Radio he expressed a special salutation from the Obamas of Kenya."
Given Obama's history, and his inclination to repeat it, we can probably anticipate Obama will say something like: I only met my half brother once. We didn't know each other well, ( he may not even be half the brother I knew ) and he is mistaken that I am a Muslim, or ever have been a Muslim... I am of the Christian Wright...It's understandable that my family over yonder are proud of me but this is just more of this typical kind of politics of fear mongering smear tactics (this time of the McCain machine) that takes us away from the primary issues...
Obama needs to realize that primary issues for Americans include Character. Honesty. Integrity.
The brother, Malik, IS another round peg that fits the round hole -
... if it sounds like a duck...
Hopefully though, this newest Obama family statement can at least help bring back the dead issue of the already presented evidence that Obama is a chameleon candidate.
A man who Lies, will lie to you again. And again.
[credit: the above photo came from stop-obama.org]
Tuesday, June 10, 2008
Barack Hussein Obama reportedly born in Hawaii on August 4, 1961, two years after Hawaii became a State.[Somewhat 'murky details', as no Hospital records exist to date of the Birth]
Obama's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, who was 18 when Obama was born, was married [also murky- as no marrige record has been seen] to Barack Hussien Obama Sr., a foriegn national studying a college Russian course, where he met Ann, before he abandoned his family and left for Harvard.
Now there is a law pertaining to Obama's birth IF he was born in Kenya and not in Hawaii.
What are the rules of US citizenship for people born between January 14, 1941 and December 23,1952?
Children born abroad to two US citizens, with one parent having resided in the US, the child was a US citizen at birth. No further action was required to maintain citizenship.
When one parent was a citizen and the other a foreign national, however, the rules changed substantially.
To pass citizenship, the citizen parent must have resided in the US for at least 10 years before the birth of the child, and at least five of those years had to be after the parent turned 16.
Because this rule made it impossible for parents under 21 to pass citizenship, in 1946 the requirement was amended to create an exception for parents who had served in World War Two.
Children born out of wedlock to a US citizen mother who met the residence requirements were automatically citizens, and they retained US citizenship even if legitimated by the foreign national father. For a child born out of wedlock to a US citizen father, to obtain US citizenship the child must have been legitimated before the age of 21.
..."10 years before the birth of the child, and at least five of those years had to be after the parent turned 16.
16+5 == 21
Barack would not have been eligible to citizenship unless he was born after his mother was 21 -
But this only applies if he was NOT born in Hawaii as presumed.
If he was born in Kenya - Senator Obama is Not eligible to occupy the office of President of the U.S.
To date Obam will not release a true and accurate Birth certifcate and continues to post a forgery at his Fight the Smears website.
To date there are 2 Hospitals reported Obama was born in ( Queens and Kapaloni (check for spelling)
However there still is NO RECORD from either hospital that Obama was born at either.
There is no HOSPITAL record of his birth.
Did Stanley Ann give birth in Kenya and rush back to Hawaii to file late registration papers on Obam's birth to ensure Obama was viewed as a US citizen and therefore eligible to all it's benefits - afrimative action bennies- schooling, medical, food stamps etc...
Where is Stanley Ann's passport? Surely the State department in charge of such records can clear up where Ann was on August 4, 1961.
Why is there no Hospital record of Obams birth?
Why is Obama producing a certified fraudulent document on his website?
Why is he not being questioned nor prosecuted for fraud?
What exactly is Obama hiding on an accurate BC he doesn't want known if he was truly born in Hawaii?
I'm also not quite sure how one goes from being Barack Hussein Obama to Barry Soetoro (without having been adopted?) and back again? I'd like to see those documents.
For the 'transparent' man of change this guys got more baggage than an airport.
All questionable hypothesis aside - should a man who clearly has committed fraud with his websites forged BC be eligible for President?
Only if you are Obama.
Saturday, June 7, 2008
When I first heard Obama speak in 2004, I said- OMGosh - You watch, this dude will be president one day!
I was mesmerized.
So several months ago, back in April, when I began paying attention to Obama's speeches I got this feeling something was 'wrong' with his words.
He seemed to be speaking some 'language' that didn't feel right.
Around the same time period I saw this Reverend Wright/James Cone challenge regarding Obama and his church. "Do you know Black Liberation Theology? Have you read James Cone?"
After reading only a few days on this invented racist political movement called 'Christianity' for neo-blackness, with the killing of the white God as one of it's mandates, I set to work researching Obama's hate inspired unchristian Afrocentric faith.
The Barack lifetime experience and 'stories' unfolded, and mostly in his own words.
Obama uses faiths as a tool for his 'collective' political agenda. The more he talks the more you will hear him link religion and State. This marketing lesson he learned from the Chicago Alinsky organizing mob.
I now know what that Obama "language" and philosophy is that made me feel something was wrong with his words...
I am not mesmerized now.
I keep wondering how all these millions can ignore the continuing controversies of Obama and vote for him. But then I have to remember that the media has crowned Obama all along the way and for the most part distinguished any fiery controversies surrounding him. I have mentioned this or that fact, about Obama's character and associates, while talking with acquaintances and they have looked shocked.
"No way!" they say. "He couldn't run for president if this (or that) was true."...
They haven't heard any bad press about Obama, but will vote for him because he talks well.
And so, as I sat and watched the DNC committee (who Know precisely what Obama is) decide that their 30 votes counted more than the millions in Florida and Michigan I was taken even further aback when they announced that they would also take an American fundamental right of, one person - one vote and HALVE it.
Has democracy for the DNC reverted to 18th century fractional politics?
It was clear that the panel needed to appear to be granting(?)FL and Michigan a seat in November, but they also needed to find a way to keep the race EVEN... And Obama still Ahead.
It was real clear to me.
Since when are Uncommitted votes assumed to be for one particular person and given to a single candidate?
To A candidate who wasn't even ON the ballot!
A candidate who (even thru all his ummms, and auhs) didn't want a re-vote and was preventing the seating because it gave Hillary an advantage.
A FULL 'uncommitted' voter proportion was simply given to Obama even when there were 3 others also Not on the ballot of whom those votes from voters could have been for?
Votes delivered to a Candidate who took himself OFF of the ballot?
Obama could have remained on the ballot. Like many of his bad decisions in life he made a choice. And like so many of Barack's 'bone-headed' choices in life, he once again gets away with bad judgment.
Obama just brushes Hillary off with that lil middle finger of his.
This panel gave the very same gesture to Hillary Clinton, and then took FOUR legitimate delegates away that had been earned by the candidate via the legitimate Hillary VOTERS.
The choice of the many was squashed by the few.
The DNC granted "uncommitted votes" in order to keep Obama in the lead, giving the person who actually won those 2 states, Hillary Clinton, no chance of catching up.
Obama, Kamu CURANG!!!
Facetious as it sounds, from now on perhaps the DNC can just give undecided votes to anyone they choose also!
You know, the polls say that 7% are undecided in this race. But, had the 'undecided' been able to decide, well, we think it's obvious that they probably would have swung over to choose Obama.
In fact, hummmm, you know, all those eligible Americans who didn't vote at all - well, we'll just add them in too!!
Meanwhile we are waiting for Lake County...
Kerry, Kennedy, Richardson, and so many more SuperDuper delegates, also defied the votes of their own constituency who voted for Hillary but then cast their lot to Obama.
Super delegate votes were supposed to be a 'representation' of the voters who cast their vote for a particular candidate in their state. They decided that their personal Choice outweighed the 10's of thousands of individuals that each of them represented.
I also have read many articles that point out that Super delegates are bought with promises, positions, and dollars.
One California Super delegate, Steven Ybarra, on Fox News stated he would give his loyalty to whichever one of the candidates gave him 20 million dollars. When asked if he would take 10 million, he said "NO!"
The Democratic vote was for sale under DNC policies?
Now, this (Super delegate B.S.)has never made any sense to me since the voter has already made clear their preference with their vote and a "regular" delegate count assigned to that vote.
So, it appears to me, that manufacturing SUPERDelegates in the first place, and making a FINISH LINE, not reachable by the 'regular delegate' count, is purely an insurance policy so that a few hundred of these elite Supers can supercede and install whomever they choose over the millions preferred choice.
Selected, and not elected.
I have to ask why they have just spent 250 million dollars on all these primaries when they could have just had these back-door comrades choose the candidate for the Democratic Party?
Oh wait- they DID!
On that note - I came away from watching the DNC Supreme Court proscription process thinking that America was lost.
Rules had reverted humans to objects.
Votes mean nothing.
Scurrilous elitist could rule.
Socialists, Racists and Marxist were in positions to outvoice millions...and revolutionize democracy at last. For that is what "CHANGE" actually is in the Obama message. I could hear the back yard organizers joking We won't even have to bus non documented dead people to the polls anymore.
To be Blunt. The Democratic Party had finally tipped over into a complete destructive Un-American evil thing for me.
I could almost hear Barack in the background saying, again: "Our individual salvation is dependent on our collective salvation..." and the zombies chanting, "Yes we can! YES we Can, YES WE CAN!"
I have both fingers up for your Obammunism-Marxist-mental-marketing salvation drivel, there buddy.
Then I saw a few very unhappy Liberal, Reagan democrat, and core Hillary supporter websites spring up.
Most of the Democrat postings give me HOPE that not all is lost for America.
Could it be that this new Obama DNC Democratic Marxist Party will have some America loving 'individuals' to silence that are resisting the BO(rg) collective-salvation of this germinating savior?
When so many of these poster comments, at these growing anti-Obama Democratic websites, say things like, My Country First and my party second - Vote No too Obama! - I had to crack a beer in salute! (and much relief - In Order For Evil To Triumph, Good People Do Nothing. I fear for this Country lately.)
I think it is Big news to read what disenfranchised Democratic Voters have to say and that they won't sit back and do nothing.
Unfortunately , most NEWS, will only report on how the dems are all coming together!
"They are upset, but they will fall in line."
This Donna Brazile doesn't think the Party needs these Hillary clinging, McCain totin', antithetical bitter people anyway.
Thankfully from reading these thousands of Dem. postings I can see they have done some Obama homework and haven't been bamboozled by Obama & Party.
an example post:
User Name jl
Comments If we are to [truly] become a color blind nation, absent of hate and prejudice, we must start with our children.
Hate is not hard wired into the human genome. It must be taught, repeated, and endorsed by a loved one or trusted individual.
Obama repeatedly exposed his children to the hate rhetoric spewed by his 'trusted man of the cloth', and by his (Obama's) presence, gave life and endorsement to it (the hate rhetoric).
Obama is not what he appears to be-Hillary is. We are far better off with McCain than we would ever be with Obama.
With Obama as president, we will do to ourselves from within what the world terrorists and radical fundamentalists have failed to do to us from without.
or another Democratic website example post:
Pledge to vote against Obama in the General Election
2:47 pm PDT, Jun 7, Name not displayed, Texas
The Democratic party is no longer the party of the people; they've gone back to the days of meeting in private and deciding who will be the nominee. Since my vote as a Democrat doesn't count any more I'll vote for McCain this fall. I bet that vote will count!
and then there's Cristi Adkins seen on Fox of Clintons4McCain and Just say no deal! , a coalition of millions sprung up overnight with one thing in common: NObama
Contrast Obama to John McCain, a man of integrity and honor, who has a record of bipartisanship and who, though Clinton supporters may not agree with on all the issues, believe they can trust.
We believe Senator Obama is a dangerous man, an inexperienced man, and yes, a racist and sexist man. We don't want him anywhere near the White House.
A CNN poll released Friday shows that the party is divided after a primary season that stretched over nearly 18 months and 57 contests.
Sixty percent of Clinton supporters said they would vote for Obama, but 17 percent said they would vote for Sen. John McCain, the presumptive Republican nominee and Obama's rival in the general election. Nearly one-quarter, 22 percent, said they would not vote at all if Clinton were not the Democrats' nominee.
The poll's margin of error was plus or minus 7.5 percentage points. The poll was conducted after Obama clinched the Democratic nomination Tuesday.
17%-39%...That is 3 to 7 million voters.
Bush only won by 526 votes...
One has to wonder what the "we'll have everything fixed up fine in 100 days" Demo leaders where thinking.
Hillary: "Senator McCain will bring a lifetime of experience to the campaign. I will bring a lifetime of experience, and Senator Obama will bring a speech he gave in 2002."
Even after having been treated so improperly by her opponent, it is clear why Hillary had to make her gracious speech, or leave the party. You could see the strain at times.
"Our president", repeated several times, came out rather flat.
However, one really has to question how Hillary will now be able to explain to Hillary voters who were shoved out of caucuses, disenfranchised by Party leaders, denigrated by Obama bloggers, attacked by hackers, and called racists for not voting Obama, just how it is that this unseasoned inexperienced Obama is now suddenly qualified to be president too these very same disrespected core supporters whom Obama now wants and needs.?
I'd lay odds Obama dearly wants Florida and Michigan voters now though...and none of that Half a human being chit either.