Thursday, November 19, 2009

Doug Hoffman Wants Recount! 4 Districts reported ZERO Votes

Four Districts report zero votes for Hoffman?

Yeah right- maybe in a Hussein's Country would zero% of a vote be reported for any opposition...

I watched that Vote being tabulated on the Fox screen all night and a peculiar oddity struck me each time the count was shown. No matter what the count was, Owens was ALWAYS 3-4 thousand ahead.
I have never seen a count remain so consistently unwavering.

If Hoffman had 13,000 - Owens had 17,000. If Hoffman had 17,000, Owens had 21,000. If Hoffman had 21,000 then Owens had 25,000...all night at every count reported this pattern repeated itself.

I found the pattern very suspicious.

That is what it has come to in our country I suppose...we no longer believe in an uncorrupted voter system.

And no matter what Bills I have read of the past to structure the voting system to eliminate voter fraud it's passage is always shot down by Democrats.

Ask yourself- Why is that?

Here's the one thing. We are told for months now that all will be well come 2010 because we can VOTE THE BUMS OUT!!!

But can we vote them out?

How do you vote the Bums out when these politicians have set up a system to employ dishonest tactics and encourage and reward fraud?

How do you vote them out when Mickey Mouse doesn't need to show proof of legal residence, birth, citizenship, or existence?

Until One legal vote for One person is addressed we are still looking at community organized fraud come 2010.

Four Districts report zero votes for Hoffman - B.S.

Here is a letter from Doug Hoffman rescinding his concession of the NY-23:

Dear Fellow Conservative,

As evidence surfaces, we find out that reported results from election night were far from accurate. ACORN and the unions did their best to try and sway the results to Obamacare supporter Bill Owens.

I was forced to concede after receiving two pieces of grim news - - down 5,335 votes with 93 percent of the vote counted on election night - and barely won my stronghold in Oswego County.
On Election Night, the information we received was far different from what we received this week!

Rest assured, they will not succeed, and I am therefore revoking my statement of concession.

That is why I am writing you today. Recent developments leave me to wonder who is scheming behind closed doors, twisting arms and stealing elections from the voters of NY-23.

I'm sure you are as dismayed as I am to learn of the mischief that took place in Oswego and neighboring counties. We know this would not be the first time for the ACORN faithful to tamper with democracy.

Now it's time to actually count every legal ballot and I need your help to ensure the people of NY-23 get the Congressman THEY ELECTED. Please donate now to help me ensure every vote is counted!

A re canvassing in the 11-county district shows Owens' lead has narrowed to 3,026. In Oswego County, I was reported to lead by only 500 votes with 93 percent of the vote counted election night, but inspectors found I actually won by 1,748 votes

Let’s force them keep this re canvassing active! Let’s give this election a chance to end differently!
Oswego County elections officials blame the mistakes on "chaos" in their call-in center that included a phone system foul-up, and on inspectors who read numbers incorrectly when phoning in results. This sounds like a tactic right from the ACORN playbook.

The district's second biggest voter turnout was in Jefferson County, where I had also benefited from a turnaround since election night, gaining another 700 votes. Owens led by 300 votes on the final election night tally, but after re canvassing, I'm now leading by 424 votes.

Jerry Eaton, the Republican elections commissioner for Jefferson County, said inspectors found a problem in four districts where my vote total was mistakenly entered as zero.

The new vote totals mean the race will be decided by absentee ballots, of which the state Board of Elections distributed about 10,200.

The people of NY-23 deserve to have their ballots counted properly, but we can't let ACORN or the unions keep that from happening. They have more lawyers and more experience tampering with democracy.
State Board of Elections Communications Director John Conklin said the state sent a letter to the House Clerk last week explaining that no winner had been determined in the 23rd District.

Now it's time to actually count every legal ballot and I need your help to ensure the people of NY-23 get the Congressman THEY ELECTED. Please donate now to help me ensure every vote is counted!

We need to make sure that fair elections are a reality in NY-23, just like our Founding Fathers envisioned. So long as we remain the "land of the free," we MUST ensure every vote is counted.
Help us today so we may be the first of many conservative victories during the Obama Regime.

Yours in Freedom,

Doug Hoffman

P.S. I ran a different kind of campaign, one where Conservatives, Republicans, Libertarians, Tea Party and 9/12 activists rallied around. ACORN, the unions and Democratic Party were scared, and that's why they tampered with the ballots of voters in NY-23. Will you please contribute today so we can show them that fair elections are the Will of the People? Thank you.

blamed on: inspectors who read numbers incorrectly when phoning in results...

Are these inspectors running ??

Who's watching the inspectors?

It is also being reported that the computer systems may have been infected with a virus.

Here's another interesting thought - "State Board of Elections Communications Director John Conklin said the state sent a letter to the House Clerk last week explaining that no winner had been determined in the 23rd District."

If this is so, that there is no winner - then Owens' vote on the House health care Bill would not count would it?
In retrospect, Joseph Cao,(R)who waited until the last minute to cast his vote, would have been faced with an entirely different choice when the count reached it's final moment.

The manipulation of the abortion issue showed democrats were willing to throw their women constituents and abortion rhetoric under the bus -- but, remember, they were hard line pro-choice before they temporarily traded against it.

Temporarily traded - because as we saw, Republican John Boehner demonstrated several times during the debates - everyone knows that the Stubeck amendment was nothing more than a manipulation of the count.

And to think that this House Stealth Squared Pill may never have passed but for some squirrels in the uninspected Owens phone lines.

Tuesday, November 17, 2009

Unnecessary (Costly) Mammography Tests

...And so it begins.

Here is a beginning sign of Health care guideline rationing to come from government sponsored entities legislating recommended cost saving effectiveness.

The new government recommendations, released Monday by the Preventive Services Task Force of the Department of Health and Human Services, recommend against regular mammography tests in women aged 40 to 49. The guidelines also downplay the effectiveness of self-examinations and advise that women aged 50 to 74 years receive mammograms every other year.

Here we are witnessing one of Obama's costly "unnecessary tests" in the making.

Breast cancer is the number two cancer killer of women in the U.S. but for all the 'talk' about prevention one of the very first things to go, under analytical examination of costs vs effectiveness, is early detection coverage.

Make no mistake- it won't be covered if the guidelines are changed.

Is this a manipulation to get Insurance Companies to fall into the trap of not covering these exams? Sure. If they don't have to pay for it they are not going too.

Then, after you complain to high heaven about not being covered, you can turn to your Obama/Kathleen Sebelius/Nancy-Ann DeParle/ Government Health care plan who also won't cover you- lest we forget who directed the rationing guidelines to begin with.

This is insurance reform, right?

Your Health care just took a giant leap towards improvement? Yes?

Of course you MAY still have an option to pay for exams out of your own pocket between 40-49...MAY...or there may be a plan to cover you - depending on the premium you can afford and further 'guidelines' we haven't even imagined yet.

The Party of mandatory Revenue and cost controlled No-Care has delivered a message.

Are you listening?

Sunday, November 8, 2009

Extremist Signs at Health care Bachmann Rally?


Of all the thousands of signs at the Capitol Health care rally the Internet is awash with reports of the 'offensive signs' that people showed up with.
Well, to be clear, some report that signs were being handed out - implying the handed out ones may have been those they found offensive.

They can only come up with a few signs that they found offensive and use these signs as their reason to condemn people who showed up as wackos.

Headlines: The 12 Most Offensive Signs From Bachmann's Tea Party ...spread the twelth.

Almost everyone of these search-and-deploy disinformation authors included in their copy-n-paste condemnation write-ups that 9 Bachmann wackos were arrested.

This fueled many responses on their websites gleefully attacking the people who came to the Capitol anti-government-controlled-Health-care rally as violent, criminal, and nuts.

Pssssst!!...The 9 arrested were pro government controlled health care people.

I was amazed that so many sites turned the protest into a race issue too. "The crowds were white right wing extremists"...
I was also surprised by the amount of Obama people who came out too support the media authors on their comments web pages.
Surprised because they have been unusually absent from websites that produce facts they can't refute.

This "sign" issue sucked the bama trollers back into life like an engorging tick on a bloodhound.

It is repeatedly reported that these health care protest participants are "Republicans".

Has anyone polled the crowds yet? It is hard to believe that there aren't Democrats in all these crowds. I recall last year the MILLIONS of Hillary supporters who helped expose Obama's background and the DNC corruption. They didn't just suddenly become couch minions of the party.

Don't describe the assembled as peaceful concerned Americans - describe them instead as 'angry' right wing 'Republicans'.

Redefine Americans. Redraw the issue. Keep people divided.

Agitate the bitter and move the fence sitter.

Why would someone be carrying a Maoist sign anyway??
Oh yeah- that's right. Obama's radical Czarina, Anita Dunn's favorite philosopher being -Mao.

Mao in the White House.
Chavez in the White House.
Communists in the White House
Alinsky in the White House.
Marx in the White House.

OH MY! People carrying a sign, or signs, comparing Obama with Marx!!

Either you aren't doing your homework or you're a part of the cover up problem.

Using Obama's own eloquent words why would anyone think that his vernacular, in many cases, is exact quotes of Karl?

Obama's hand picked Czars are Maoists-Marxist-communists-socialists-globalists- anti-capitalists - and they admire dictators and spurn our founding Constitution as needing to be rightfully 'changed' to their personal philosophies.

Why would any American question anti-American values in the Obama House?

Why would anyone have a sign comparing what is happening in our country, as Obama builds an Americorps army and takes over banks, Car companies, media, Newspapers, Internet, Education, Health care, (etc.) too Hitler's socialist/fascist take over of Germany?
Why would you dare protest that?
Why would you even think it?

Having said that - does one think for a moment that strike busting tactics wouldn't be employed by infiltrating crowds with trained sign carrying agitators?

These authors write- It is so appalling that signs compare Obama to Hitler or the holocaust...where were these disgusted partisans when Bush was compared to Hitler? (it only took me moments to copy and paste together these Bush google images)

The hypocrisy of this liberal biased media, who scout the crowd looking for offensive signs to try to make a deliberative point that, see, what we have here is a crowd of extremists, is pathetic.
Where were they - their disgust and condemnation- when the signs called for the death of a president?

There never were any apologies from Democrats for their people protesting with signs such as these above. Yet they demand Michele Bachmann apologize that someone (not hundreds) - someone- showed up with a sign showing an image comparing Socialist Health care to the Holocaust.

Why is there always a double standard with liberals?

The outrage directed at a few non-approved signs, that politicians may not even have seen, is not the real issue with these poison keyboard engineers. The issue with these misleading media types is to negatively 'label' people who gather together and minimize context with smearing attacks to obscure the actual issues.

Crowd control. Association guilt.

Alinsky’s RULE Number 12(13): "Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it."

These signs are NOT the issue.

I want to remind anyone reading this (that disagrees ) of just one of Obama's statements that has people carrying signs and trying to warn you of what is to come for your 'post-existing' conditions:
Obama on brokering treatment options: "There is going to have to be a very difficult democratic conversation that takes place... The chronically ill and those toward the end of their lives are accounting for potentially 80 percent of the total health- care bill out here."

Yet anyone with a "Save Grandma" sign is ridiculed and called a whack job?

Blind, fool, or needing a tax dictionary, to describe what IS is, Obama wants to have a required cost effective democratic conversation with you, or yours, and the billing burden of actually providing ANY health care when you'll need it most.

The Stimulus Bill has already provided funds and staffed the democratic distributive jury that will decide whether you fit in Obam's 80% bracket.

If you can't figure out what That above Obama statement means without reading or understanding a single line of these ration-controlled health manifestos then get ready to go home, shut up, and take your pill.

This Health care Bill is a mandated unconstitutional government control of our lives, liberty, choice and privacy.
I say Hell NO!

If that resisting imagery somehow makes one an extremist then I'm your huckleberry.


Saturday, November 7, 2009

Exclusive: Interview with Rep. Joe Wilson on Health Care

Exclusive: Interview with Rep. Joe Wilson on Health Care

by Washington News Observer

Today, tea party and other conservative activists are holding rallies in Washington, DC as part of the “House Calls on Congress” event. Big Government has a reporter covering the events and will have a report later today. Earlier this week, Washington News Observer sat down with South Carolina Congressman Joe Wilson to discuss the current landscape for health care legislation.

Friday, November 6, 2009

Michele Bachmann Rallies thousands Protesting "KILL the BILL!"

Mark Levin And 20-40,000 At US Capitol Protest Obamacare 11/5/2009

Jon Voight on Obama Socialist Destruction of America

Thursday, November 5, 2009

Obama Expands Government with Bribes-Threats-Extortion

And where are our representatives?
There is a poor connection somewhere.
I just don't see them on the floor shouting "can you hear me now".

This is an older story from Judge Andrew Napolitano going back into September and heated up again in April.
As of yesterday the Obama Admin. is still trying to force all banks into his pool of government control with threats and extortion.

Now they want to go after 'wages' and bonuses.

If 'control' wasn't clear, when Obama refused to except TARP funds BACK from Banks who had taken money, it should be clear now that he has his sights set on dictating to banks who never took a dime of Obama dollars.
Don't fool yourself, these companies are Obama owned - or, have you received a dividend check lately?

Our Government Engaged In EXTORTION With Our Banks!
By Judge Andrew Napolitano
FOX News Senior Judicial Analyst

The Federal government committed extortion and they’re not being held accountable. What’s next? Listen to this: I recently met with the Chair and CEO of one of the country’s top 10 bank holding companies. His bank is worth in excess of $250 billion, has no bad debt, no credit default swaps, no liquidity problems, and no sub prime loans. He told me that he and others were forced by Treasury and FDIC threats to take TARP funds, even though he did not want or need them.

There is simply no authority in the U.S. Constitution for Congress to exercise the level of control it now seeks over private industry.

The FDIC — with Treasury backing — threatened to conduct public audits of his bank unless his board created and issued a class of stock for the Feds to buy. The audit, which he is confident his bank would survive, would cost it millions in employee time, bad press, and consequent lost business.

He pleaded with the Feds to leave his successful bank alone. He begged his board to let him tell the Feds to take a hike. But they gave in. The Feds are now just a tiny shareholder, but want to begin asserting more and more control. This is a classic extortion: Controlling someone’s free will by threatening to perform a lawful act. (Blackmail is the threat is to perform an unlawful act in order to control someone else’s free will.) There are no exceptions in the statutes prohibiting extortion for government persons

This happened in September 2008, but the demands for more control are more recent. It sounds to me like Paulson, Geithner, Bernanke, and Sheila Blair have all read a biography of Benito Mussolini. I guess they skipped the last chapter.

There is simply no authority in the U.S. Constitution for Congress to exercise the level of control it now seeks over private industry. In fact, this level of control will wind up costing the businesses that took TARP (voluntarily or involuntarily) money since they will lose key employees who will go to work elsewhere and because the reporting requirements will take time and time is money. The Constitution basically says that if the government wants to take time or freedom or money from someone or something, it must sue for it. It cannot just give itself the authority to do so via legislation.

Our liberties are slipping away right before our eyes.

Obama's UnConstitutional BRIBES to Harness the Education System

Every day I wake up to find the formation of the Obama nation moving more pieces into place for end around Congress and Constitutional take over issues.

Using taxpayer dollars Obama is dangling a 5 billion dollar stimulus bribe in 10-20 States to follow the Obama Education plan.

The $5-billion grant fund has been titled “Race to the Top,” and the money is part of Obama’s $787-billion economic stimulus package. States must compete for the money, which Education Secretary Arne Duncan will dispense at Obama’s pleasure with no Congressional control. Only 10 to 20 states are expected to actually receive some of the grant money.

Obama promoted the competitive grants while visiting a Wisconsin middle school. He was trying to influence a November 5 vote by state legislators about linking teacher performance ratings to student test scores. This effectively links a teacher’s pay to how well his students perform, based on what's being tested. Wisconsin lawmakers are expected to lift a ban on establishing this connection, presumably so the state can qualify for some of Obama’s grant money.

The Obama administration has said that refusing to link teacher performance ratings to student test scores would lessen a state’s chance of receiving federal funds. In Wisconsin, Obama wrapped the bribe he is offering in high-sounding language about the importance of education.

Any State who doesn't implement the Obama plan lessens chance of receiving funds- otherwise known as, No you Won't.

Teachers will be obligated to please the Obama people or be denied extended funds.

Keep in mind the news you have heard in the past years- whereby the hammer used to force participation in whatever plan the Feds want compliance in is always a threat to withdraw funds. Accept the bribe and comply or suffer punishment.

In this bearded Obama puzzle once you have accepted Fed funds, like a bank, they own you and become your voice by taking your voice away. And much like the Banks we have heard about - once they own you - they begin dictating what your policies will be- how much pay you will receive - who will be hired to replace who they fire...and much like the banks once they have their claws in, they turn their sights on the rest of the non government controlled.

In the recent exposures of this Administrations in your face maneuvers to control every sector of industry and private life 'changes' one has to wonder when it will 'force' non participating States into the Obama program.

Let's not forget who wrote this APPOLO Stimulus Bill from which this 5 Billion comes from. Communist Van Jones. Terrorist Jeffrey Jones.

Anything coming out of this Stimulus Bill must be held suspect and looked into. Anti-Americans writing policy for Americans has to have their agenda funded.

Re-education is a big part of their agenda.

Hitching the education system to the Obama Marxist wagon through play for pay tactics is another slick monetary enticement to surrender to Obama control.

This kind of bribery is an unconstitutional exercise of executive branch power over the states. The Congress is supposed to have the purse strings of the federal government, not the President or his staff members. There is no authorization in the Constitution for the federal government either to take taxpayer money, to borrow money, or to simply print money and use it to bribe states into compliance with the President’s wishes.

Wednesday, November 4, 2009

Obama turns back on Pro-Democracy Again

First, Obama AIDS in Honduras Dictator to be returned to power by cutting off all AID to Honduras thereby forcing Their Congress to re vote their position - then rather than Aid Iranian freedom fighters with support, if only in words that matter, he turns his back on Iranian Pro-Democracy demonstrators in Iran. Again.

As Obama can't seem to make up his mind to support the troops that are presently in Afghanistan he seems to have little problem supporting American hating dictator regimes.

"Death to America" fanatics, today, celebrate the 30 years of Islamic oppression and take over of the US Embassy and imprisonment of US citizens as Carter sat on his undecided butt. Thousands of pro-democracy anti-Ahmedinejad protesters showed up and were attacked as they chanted "Death to Dictators"... and they had a message to Obama that they also chanted, "Obama, Obama — either you’re with them or you’re with us."

Obama doesn't want the dictators to conclude that these freedom from tyranny protesters are teabag mobs or Western influenced AstroTurf agitators and so has decided that non-support is the best message to send to the dictators.

Strength, might, and Right, through disarmament of encouraging words.

We wouldn't want to use words that the clerical regime could use against us, were the words of purple heart Kerry.

Accusing the U.S. of interference is a rant from Ahmedinejad anyway, like, there was never a Holocaust...but we will 'change' their minds to both by remaining silent.

Under any circumstances the Islamic regime will say whatever it takes to fire up their base.

Outbursts will only allow the status quo to continue with additional strength, says Obama.

Change won't come from the Top down!

Ironic, let us all begin to be fearful of the words dictators use against us was a point I was going to make against Kerry's argument...though it hasn't silenced American protesters it sure has been an Obama troops weapon.

As Obama uses tax payer dollars to fly around firing up his own base in '09 elections, and our generals still await a decision to support our troops, Obama dithers again rather than promote democracy and lend support to freedom seeking people.

"Obama, Obama — either you’re with them or you’re with us."

Obama has concluded that what the oppressed peoples of Iran need to do is to settle their own problems.

The poor chanting Iranian people have got it all wrong since the big effectiveness change in America.
Obama people don't support or encourage liberty and freedom -
If you're not with Obama - You need to change. mmm - mmm- mmmm

"Transparency Like You’ve Never Seen Before” The White House Visitor Log

The White House website for it's visitors list says:

"Transparency Like You’ve Never Seen Before

Almost choked on my Pepsi when I read that. My monitor is a dripping mess.

Another Obama misleading lie.

These visitor logs have been requested through the Freedom of Information Act for months and months...and Obama has refused to turn them over citing Presidential private privilege.
I won't go into the history of this bogus transparency propaganda -I'll just direct you to the stories already written.

Obama refuses access.

As with everything about Obama you must ask yourself WHY?

Why hide who you're meeting?

It is difficult to believe this is a full list for so many months of records of visitation when it is reported that thousands visit the WH each month.

The story for me is the names on the list and the Obama transparent response.

One sees the names of Bill Ayers and Jeremiah Wright on the visitors list- yet the WH says they are NOT THE William Ayers and THE Jeremiah Wright - .


Of course there is the Nazi collaborator and anti-American Obama Banker George Soros on the list.

SEIU, children of the corn branch, Andy Stern, on list 22 times - Big peoples Union making 'progress'.

Also reported is that domestic terrorist Jeffrey Jones is on the list having visited 7 times...that one I have to say is probably not a correct assumption by people...the Middle initial on the list for Jeffrey is "A."...
Jeffrey Jones, architect of the failing APPOLO Stimulus package ( written along with Obama ousted Communist Czar Van Jones) has a middle initial of "C." - for not Karl...Carl.

Haven't had time to look at other names on list but since the collective birds of a feather cluster together - I wouldn't be surprised by who's who on the list and their collaborative links to engineering transformational versions of unconstitutional justice.

Obama should rename the log- The Reverse Engineers of American Freedoms list.

Monday, November 2, 2009

Health care: Crown jewel of Socialism - Cradel to Grave Government Control

Michele Bauchmann calls for ralley Thursday, Nov. 5th, at noon, at the Capitol, to protest this Unconstitutional health care Bill that the House plans on voting on friday.

If you can be there - please do so.

Interview On Health Care

Legacy of Community Organizers: Stealing Elections

Will Corzine Allies Steal the Election in New Jersey? ACORN, Dirty Tricks and Absentee Ballot Fraud

by Capitol Confidential see this article and people comments @ Big

New Jersey Governor Jon Corzine is locked in the political fight of his life. With just hours left before voting, polls show a neck-and-neck race between Corzine and GOP candidate Chris Christie, with Independent candidate Chris Daggett pulling significant support. Obama and VP Biden are making last ditch pitches for the embattled governor. But evidence is building that Corzine’s campaign may see its only salvation is in rigging the election.

The first sign is a straight-up dirty trick. Daggett’s run for office is certainly convenient for Corzine, as he will help split any anti-Corzine vote. And, as a Corzine political appointee, one wonders if his candidacy wasn’t a set up to begin with. Now, in the final days of the campaign, it appears state democrats are paying for robo calls supporting Independent Chris Daggett. First reported here, the robo calls attack Christie (but not Corzine) and promote Daggett. At the end of the call, it is mentioned that the calls are paid for by a “project of the NJSDC.” No idea what that acronym stands for, but New Jersey State Democratic Committee, isn’t too big of a stretch. More interesting is the fact that the return number on the calls is the same number that was used to promote Maryland Governor Martin O’Malley’s election in closing days of the 2006 race.

More telling that the fix is in, however, is the sudden appearance of ACORN on the scene. Not by name, mind you, as their reputation is so tarnished that even New Jersey Democrats don’t want to be associated with them. No, in New Jersey ACORN sought cover behind its big brother, SEIU, specifically SEIU Local 32BJ.

The political director for the SEIU local is Peter Colavito. Just last year, he was ACORN’s political director in New York, working directly under Bertha Lewis, ACORN’s CEO and co-chair of ACORN-backed Working Families Party. He was, and remains, a top official and board member of the Working Families Party in New York. In fact, his wife is currently an employee of the Working Families Party. Corzine has made much of his endorsement by the SEIU local, failing to mention the union’s deep ties to both ACORN and its Working Families Party in New York.

These ties are starting to appear, however. GOP officials recently received a phone tip from a hospital in Newark, reporting that people in ACORN t-shirts were in the facility signing up and collecting absentee ballots. New Jersey law allows anyone to take up to 10 absentee ballots at a time. The tipster reported seeing individuals in the ACORN shirts entering the hospital with blank absentee ballots and leaving with completed ballots.

There are reports out of Camden, New Jersey that voters are discovering that absentee ballots have already been submitted under their name. They did not authorize these ballots. Early reports suggested that the number of absentee ballots ‘requested’ in Camden city is higher than in any previous election. This will no doubt spark confusion on election day.

Possibly anticipating this confusion, the state Democratic Committee recently sent a letter to the Secretary of State, arguing that any absentee ballot that is rejected should still be counted as a “provisional” vote. The letter complained that almost 3,000 absentee ballots had already been rejected “solely on the basis of a comparison of their signature to the signature on record.” Solely? If the signature of the voter doesn’t match the signature on the ballot, is there really a reason to look at anything else? The letter from the state Democrats suggests that election officials should simply verify that the address on the absentee ballot matches the address on record. Right, and my bank should go ahead and cash any suspicious check as long as the address on the check matches my home address.

The best hope here is that Christie wins by enough of a margin that these dirty tricks are moot. As they say in sports, put enough points on the board and the refs can’t steal it from you.

[Ed Note: Big Government will be working closely on election day with Election Journal and its army of citizen journalists and videographers to document any instances of voter fraud in New Jersey. We welcome the help of readers in New Jersey. If you would like to volunteer to help maintain the integrity of the democratic process, please send an email to You can use this same email to report any voting irregularities you witness on Tuesday. Also, please send in any of your own documentary video of problems at polling places. Big Media may ignore stories of voter fraud, but together we can shine the critical light on it.]

Sunday, November 1, 2009

Imperial Presidency: A Total Gangster Government

Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) speaking on the House floor: Now we've moved into the realm of gangster government.

Saturday, October 31, 2009

GOP candidate Dede Scozzafava quits!! Polls showed Hoffman Beating Her

DeDe quits!

Water Town Daily Times - statement from Scozzafava as polls show her behind:

"Today, I again seek to act for the good of our community," Ms. Scozzafava wrote in a letter to friends and supporters. "It is increasingly clear that pressure is mounting on many of my supporters to shift their support. Consequently, I hereby release those individuals who have endorsed and supported my campaign to transfer their support as they see fit to do so. I am and have always been a proud Republican. It is my hope that with my actions today, my party will emerge stronger and our district and our nation can take an important step towards restoring the enduring strength and economic prosperity that has defined us for generations."

Owens (D) has support from 36 percent of likely voters in the poll, with Mr. Hoffman (C) garnering 35 percent support. Ms. Scozzafava (r) has support from 20 percent of those polled.

It ain't over til it's over though.
DeDe has some lefty views and a 20% following.
Some may have just been covering her as an (R) and some percentage to her social issues.

Even a split puts it too close to call...and you can imagine(pun)Valerie Jarret is on the phone too ACORN ordering buses.

update: it appears too have taken Dede, a proud self-sacraficing Republican, less than 24 hours to define her self. Or re-define her unmasked self. Having stated she wanted her (R) party to emerge stronger she now says today that she has decided to support the Democrat Owens.

As if we didn't know where her loyalties were anchored...Wake Up Michael Steele.

Friday, October 30, 2009

The G.O.P. : The Party of NO

The GOP is being labeled the Party of NO... meaning that many feel the party no longer stands for anything.

Eric Cantor, the No. 2 House Republican, hopes to change all that.

Cantor is convinced that taking the long view is the path to success: health care and global warming may be the topics du jour, but "the narrative next year leading into the election, will be all about the economy. It'll be about jobs, it'll be about people's economic security."

It's the economy stu...This is true - it is always true. All this money the dems are printing up and borrowing from china (while Obama lends 2 billion to Soros Brazilian Oil wells) has not produced jobs; except for the jobs in expansion of government.

By NEXT YEAR any economic recovery would be claimed by the democrats, so what the heck is Cantor thinking? WAIT til next year?

Much as Obama and crew have set a time-line for Healthcare to not even kick in until after the 2012 elections, the republicans fail to recognize how Obama has set up already for the economic improvement just before 2010 elections by having held back nearly all of the Stimulus Funds until then.Think about it. It's reported that nearly 700 billion is unspent - YET they already talk about another Stimulus Bill - that one would obviously need to kick in just about 2012.

IT is precisely the topics du jour that the republicans Should be addressing! Very loudly.
Which they are not doing.

Have you not seen the nations protests?

The GOP is missing their only chance to define themselves.

Cantor says about the economy, "But I do think with an eye toward 2010 that we do have to commit ourselves to the challenges that are not being addressed."

NO-sir. What you need to do is too challenge, in 2009, right now, today, what this Obama crew is doing to 'transform' America.

You may not have the Votes to stop them but you have a voice- and we aren't hearing it.

You give us people like this Dede Scozzofava (R) and think that she is the path to success??

If you can't beat 'em, get yourself assimilated?

This nutter Grayson (D) is followed around like a pop star because he creates controversy - when are any of you so called leaders going to create a counter platform to this Obama revolution?

Stand up and SHOUT Hell NO!

Shout it every day. All Day.

Next years economy my rear. By next year it will be Obama's economy and it won't have a structure that we recognize as free market capitalism.

If you can't yell hell No everyday and protest then you are not just the party of No - you are the party of Yes we can.

When asked about how he will pay for any initiatives, Cantor is quick to point out that the group is in a nascent stage: "We've identified the problems. And now we intend to bring in experts and look at solutions."

Though midterm elections tend to be referendums about the party in power, Republicans know that if they have any shot at regaining the majority, they have to give voters a reason to pull the lever for them.

Mr. Cantor- you haven't identified the problem. You want experts? Read the damned signs at Teaparty express gatherings.

You want to fill your coffers for re-election and get out the information? Then Stand up like Joe Wilson and call a liar and liar. Call this Marxist express a threat to America.

Cantor says the GOP has identified four areas of 'the problem'?
Only four? You want to give a reason to pull the lever for you?

How about these:

I won't join the ranks of any Obama unionized proletariat working party.

Take Obama's, to each his ability capped, job and shove it.

My grandchild will not be forced into AmeriCorps brown shirt servitude.

My freedom of speech and information will not be controlled by leftist localism.

My Constitution will not be changed without Amendment.

My path to information will not be stifled and silenced by threats of government retribution.

I will not be forced by Government to participate in a socialist health Ponzi scheme.

I will not be nudged into government behavioral modifications and taxed for my Pepsi sins.

I will no longer give up freedom for security.

I will not belong to the Global new World order.

I will not be dictated to by UN standards.

I will not agree to Obama's decree of too little government.

I will call a terrorist a terrorist.

I will never trade liberty in for what's good for me decreed and controlled by government.

I will not surrender choices.

My right to bear arms is my protection from invasion of tyranny.

My right to fail is my learning process.

My ability to succeed or fail is self-determination and not regulation.

I am an individual and not a brothers keeper of a collective body.

I will not participate in the Marxist brick by brick removal of capitalism and the opened pathway to communism.

International climate change agreement controlling Financial markets thru global government must not be signed.

Diversity does not mean that my own differences and objections will not be tolerated.

I will not have children being indoctrinated and modified in our schools.

I will no longer fear any label that allows political correctness to silence me.

I will not have Czars with UN_American values transforming America.

I will no longer be fooled by the words "social justice".

I will not have a President who is dishonest about where he is taking America.

I share sacrifice with whom I choose, I spread wealth through consumerism...If I want redistribution I will go to a garage sale.

Mr. Cantor, sir, You want an identity? You want reasons?

What the hell is the matter with you GOP people?

Don't you recognize the passion that moves people this last year?

You are not listening to the people. They have already developed the platform.

If you don't stand with the AMERICAN Obama resisters as their leader voices then you don't deserve to be re-elected by freedom seekers and they will continue to leave you and find people somewhere else who will stand up to the Marx model Obama is building every day.

I would rather be without a job than an apathetic employee of America's demise and a contributor to any leader who did nothing to stop it.

A Stimulus Bill written by communists...and we have to find out about it by Glenn Becks investigative researchers.

As more and more republicans drop out of registration the Party Leaders struggle to find an answer to what to DO to define themselves while trying to distance themselves from a label.

What to do...we've identified the problem that hasn't been addressed by the sitting Democrats...HEY! I know!! Let's think about jobs for next year...

That's the GOP delayed until 2010-plan as all this daily extremism of 'change' occurs.

As the GOP tries to figure a strategy out they are blind to the millions that would join them if they would actually stand up to Obama and say We are indeed the Party of NO!! and there ain't no dang way you are transforming America into a party of equally controlled have-nothing slaves.

A main Voice I hear objecting repeatedly to Obama's attack on America is:
Michele Bachmann

Thursday, October 29, 2009

When the hell will Obama make a decision to Support our Military?

If I Die before You Wake: sung by Dustin Evans

Obama continues to avoid yes-no decisions and remains merely 'present'.

I can't write with civility about the "somber" photop-Obama standing there saluting those 18 cases of American bodies returning from Afghanistan in Dover today... As he golfs and shoots hoops he can't seem to make up his mind to follow his military generals advice to win this war, or too continue too stall for months placating his left anti-war constituency, while lives are being lost.

God bless our military and their families.

SONG: Time to worry 'bout this Obamanation: What's happenin' to our land?

Ed Montana - Obamanation!

Tuesday, October 27, 2009

Dede Scozzafava : Why the GOP will Continue to Fail

Keep Friends close, and enemies closer...
Does the GOP think they have to become the opposition in order to pander to the Dems-friends' money and votes?

Are Republicans now so without their own values that the only thing that matters in the end is (R)?

The GOP in New York has given us liberal Dede Scozzafava, sponsored by ACORNs Working Families Party (a Marxist offshoot of The New Party that Obama was a member of in his first Senate race).

Newt Gingrich, who endorses Scozzafava, would have us believe it is none of our business what goes on in New York politics.


I don't live in the district - I am thousands of miles away from New York - but I use the word "us" because what the GOP does there, supported by Newt -who also doesn't live there- eventually effects us all when it comes to a candidates agendas and policies, values and votes; of their principles that will change our lives no matter where we live. Sometimes by a single vote.

Never forget, as one example, that in 2006 a Flag Burning Amendment, to protect our Flag, the symbol of our proud nation, Failed to pass by One Vote in the Senate.

Mr. Citizen of the world, Obama, who must have felt that desecration of the flag was an expression of patriotic speech behavior, voted to defeat it's protection from abuse and contempt.
One vote.

Scozzafava, Dierdre, AKA, pro abortion, pro gay marriage, pro-tax, social progressive, married to a community union organizer...supported by DailyKos - Bertha Lewis Workers Family Party- ACORN ...I don't even need to go on.

The GOP isn't just trying to 'appear' liberal to liberals.
They are actively allowing and supporting infiltration and change of leftist values not shared by their base, WHILE also trying to convince the NY conservative base that Dede is 'conservative!'.

The ideological record speaks for Dede.

Republicans like Sarah Palin, Fred Thomson, and Pawlenty are supporting Conservative Party candidate Doug Hoffman. Principle and values before party.

Republicans, like Newt Gingrich, say conservatives are abandoning the GOP to support "Conservative Party" candidate, Doug Hoffman (C).

That statement says a lot. Conservatives aren't abandoning the GOP. Once again the GOP has abandoned conservatives.
How ironic, I guess, that a conservative might want to support a conservative. Especially when the GOP choice is a liberal Democrat.

The problem they hammer at is the vote numbers will be divided between Hoffman (C) and DeDe (R) and thus deliver the win to the democrat Owens(D)...Owens says that Dede is even further left than he is.

We are always told don't waste your vote.

I'd say don't give us people who are wasting our vote then.

Let's face it. It's already a split vote!!
The division was ordained by the GOP.
In this case, you either vote for the liberal Democrat values, or you vote for the socialist backed liberal republican values.

They are the same.

Had the GOP given the (R) ticket to Hoffman to begin with their wouldn't be a GOP fear of wasting a vote through division.

This seat shouldn't have been OPEN anyway. When the Republicans were already seat shy of stopping the coming Obama transformation votes what does John McHugh do?? He excepts Obama's Secretary of the Army offer opening the seat to Obamamania.

This wasn't a bi-partisan move from Obama. It was a deliberate removal of one more Republican vote.
John McHugh should never hold a Republican seat ever again for his abandonment.

Hoffman is a person with the Republican and/or/ Conservative values. Yet the GOP gives us DeDe.

Then the party tells you don't vote for the person with your values?
Vote for the person who has none of your values because with your added numbers then Dede can beat a (D).

The Seat at any means or way.

A little late to be worrying about numbers; ask Mr. Secretary of the Army which no one has ever heard of again.

They think they can hang on to the Conservative vote numbers by relying on the threat of a (D) getting the seat - while at the same time trying to assimilate radical voter numbers to their side by using a radical as bait.
And then, blaming the actual Conservative as the reason for a loss.

The GOP is the reason for the loss if it occurs.
Especially if DeDe wins.

This is why the GOP will continue to fail as they sell out values for an (R) seat that they give to people who are loyal to opposition ideals, and vote FOR, upholding their own leftist standards once they get into position of power to 'change' power right out of repubs hands.

An (R) seat, that in the end, gives the GOP no principled voice to retain or explain any difference between a Democrat and a Republican.
An (R) seat that serves the opposition's power base while leftist money takes this seat even further to the left.
And the GOP wants people in NY to vote for this absurd chair of numbers because DeDe says she's a paper (R)?

This GOP continues to support their own demise.

What is the GOP thinking??

Independent sounds better everyday. That's where many conservatives are moving.

Here's what I say to the GOP.

Enlist candidates without radical ties who care about our Country first!

Stop giving us candidates who have an (R) by their name only.

Friday, October 23, 2009

Oath to the Constitution: Barack Obama's Birth Certificate

This week I got involved responding (in the comments area) to the ole Obama BC versus COLB controversy.
I'm not well read up on the issue though I followed many websites who did Tech work on the Bama COLB last year.
Texasdarling (seems to require a password now) and Atlas-shrugged had many Technical findings of COLB forgery explanations that I just couldn't follow or duplicate as a non-techie.
IF the Tech findings are accurate then the Obama COLB is a forgery.

The ridiculing Obama clan, who produce not a single image analysis expert of their own,(that I am aware of) quickly labeled anyone who believed in the findings to be "birthers" and settled on a term of endearment for "birthers" that they hold to be without question, self evident- birthers are idiots.

Oh, you're one of those poor delusional thing, you.

Here's the one thing - the foundational premise for being such a 'birther' tracks to a basic fundamental issue that should never be held in ridicule and contempt. Our Constitution.

In reality an Obama disdainfully labeled 'birther' is a constitutionalists seeking to have the Constitution upheld.

Alinsky tactics can never shame one for taking that position.

People across the land who have questioned Obama's 'constitutional' eligibility to the Office of POTUS in court after court have been turned away due to lack of what the 'justice' system calls lack of 'standing'.

I've never understood how American citizens have no legal standing when it comes to a constitutional issue being violated.
If a person is violating someones constitutional rights- he is first assumed innocent until proven guilty - but the case is not thrown out BEFORE the facts are presented by both sides and a judgment can be rendered on the evidence. Apparently this type of accusatory specified individualized constitutional 'injury' is acceptable as standing.

That was probably a bad example and or poorly explained - bottom line is if the Constitution Has Been violated all of these Judges who took an oath to uphold it, and protect it, have washed their hands of their responsibility too it, and turned their backs on the people who stand up for it, denying their day in court and due process.

Obama is being accused of perpetrating a fraud in violation of our Constitution which injures every individual.

The Constitution itself has been injured, if not mortally changed, without review or Amendment.

Historically our founding fathers had an absolute intent when they specified in Article II Section 1, Clause 5 that none other than a "natural born" citizen was qualified to hold the office of POTUS and command the armies of the US.

Natural born does not mean... without an epidural.

Vattel in 1758. In book one chapter 19, § 212. of Citizens and naturals.
The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights

Natural born means having both parents of US citizenship.

That is the definition of a “natural born Citizen,” as recognized by numerous U.S. Supreme Court and lower court decisions (The Venus, 12 U.S. 253(1814), Shanks v. Dupont, 28 U.S. 242 (1830), Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1856), Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1875) , Ex parte Reynolds, 20 F. Cas. 582 (C.C.W.D. Ark 1879), United States v. Ward, 42 F. 320 (1890); Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), Ludlam, Excutrix, & c., v. Ludlam, 26 N.Y. 356 (1863)

Obama's father was Not a US citizen. He was a British citizen who passed that citizenship to Obama Jr. when Obama was born.

Whether Obama was born in Hawaii, or on the moon, or whether the COLB is true or false, is probably keeping lots of us distracted from a more primary issue; and that is that Obama, at birth, without question, held Dual citizenships.

This is Unconstitutional.

Obama is not constitutionally eligible to hold the office of the President of the United States.

Will any citizen, natural or otherwise, ever get a day in court to return our documents intent to it's rightful nature?

Alan Keyes case is reported by Captain's Quarters to actually be scheduled with DATES to proceed.
Apparently Mr. Keyes run for president is considered, so far, as the only 'individual' who may have been 'injured' by a dishonest Birth-defect action of Obama.
But, everywhere one reads the Judge in the case appears to be doing some back-peddling and squirrely things. He reportedly hired one of Obama's legal team as a clerk? I would say he wants to be disqualified. Case to be passed on to someone who will throw it out.

I also fear this Orly Taitz case will be a terrible blow in further attempts to bring any future cases due to this Kenyan BC that is being presented to the court that looks as phony as an Obama promise.

I have no faith that a court will ever proceed and find in favor of the people of the United States. The Obama liberal judges won't go against clan principle and the Constitutionalists judge just won't chance shouting "fire" in our theater.

So how do we enforce our constitution if the courts won't?

I thought a lot about this and I have come up with an idea.

First we MUST make sure that in 2010 the House and Senate majority is replaced by strong constitutional Honest Independent and Republican patriots. (Many Republican's need to be replaced also!)
Without these, balancing power, the social-Marxist-Maoist changers will continue to implement Obamas' conquest policies for another full 2 years.

Then the idea is: We must insist through letters and emails and calls that this new majority of representatives produce a BILL that all future presidential candidates MUST produce for inspection an original long form BC. The BILL must also clarify that a "natural born" citizen is a child born of TWO US citizens as to the intent of the founding fathers in prohibiting dual citizen allegiance.

Now, having thought this over for about 3 days look what I came across when I asked google search if anyone has thought about writing a BILL...(I'm always months behind with ideas :)

The Presidential Eligibility Act (H.R. 1503) - March 12, 2009

Washington, May 15 - On March 12, 2009 Congressman Posey introduced H.R. 1503, a bill to amend the Federal Election Campaign Act to require beginning in 2012, the principal campaign committee of a candidate for election to the Office of President to include with the committee's statement of organization documentation (including a birth certificate) as may be necessary to establish that the candidate meets the qualifications for eligibility to the Office of President under the Constitution.

..."meets the qualifications for eligibility to the Office of President under the Constitution."

This Bill has gone no-where; it languishes in Committee.

Too my fellow readers -In your travels to strong major informational sites you might want to remind people who don't know about this Bill that it will need support and point them to the Congressman's website.
Be sure to ask for a "natural citizen" intent clause to be in it.

Cheers! Have a gd day.

Thursday, October 22, 2009

Obama bans Fox News from Press Pool: The Press Pool Members Back FOX!

The Obama administration has made it clear that in order for Obama 'change' to occur freedom of speech and expression must be silenced by shutting down access too, and reporting of, information that citizens are entitled to know.
OH, and don't dare to assemble to protest or be ridiculed as insignificant astroturfers, racists, and domestic terrorists.

Alan Grayson (D-FL), who gets nuttier by the week, has stated that Fox news is the enemy of America and an enemy of peace.

Axelrod and Emanuel state Fox is not a News organization.

Following these type of (pre-positioned?) announcements this White House announced that the FOX News Network would not be able to conduct an interview of "Pay Czar" Kenneth Feinberg as a member of the Press Pool.
The Pool is a five-member group consisting of ABC, CBS, CNN, Fox News and NBC organized by the White House Correspondents Association.

The Pool Members stepped up to the free press plate and told the White House (Obama-Dunn) if Fox is out, then we are out.
They wouldn't allow the WH to tell them how to behave and who was entitled to News and who was not.

Had the Obama House succeeded in enlisting these News organizations, in this media corp separation coup, you can bet the farm that FOX would have been excluded from any and all future interviews.

When you think about the Obama chess board of czars and their radical ideologies this move may have been more than a simple behavioral modification warning to Fox - as a functional test case it could very well have been a prelude to just how far Mark Lloyd would have been able to goose-step onto the playing field with his Marxist FCC changes without objections.

Obama wrongly identified his liberal media coalition as being pawns in the drool bag.

Do these Networks at last finally recognize that if they relinquish media control to Obama all is lost?

After years now of ignoring the best interests of the people in our country are they finally at least responding to their own selfish best interests? Or are they truly taking a stand for free undictated press?

We can only HOPE.

I will hold off on applause, and thanks, (though-I did shout YES!!) until I see the tingle is being replaced by an itch to uncover and transmit politicized truths too people and start being America's watchdogs rather than Obama's attack dogs.

Obama backed off and allowed Fox News to attend and interview his "Pay Czar" Kenneth Feinberg.


To keep the message clear that dissent will still be punished, much like a Humanna gag order, the regular 5 minute interview sessions were cut to two minutes each.

This is a small example of the Obama promised unity at work.

It does go to show- when people stick together - and say NO you CAN'T! that the Obama Marx locomotive can be slowed down. Obama has lots of unconstitutional engineered boxcars lined up, on track, and ready to roll.

This 'all fired up' Obama War on American values, and it's peoples', must be completely derailed.

"Our liberty cannot be guarded but by the freedom of the press, nor that be limited without danger of losing it." --Thomas Jefferson to John Jay, 1786.

Saturday, October 17, 2009

Hawaiian NewsPaper Collusion?? : All isn't Ducky in the Obama Wave State?

A few days back I saw UP Headlines - first at one of the sites that link me in their feed - can't recall which - but I do recall reading at the Free Republic site about this "KENYAN-BORN" 2004 East African Standard article.
I plugged it into google wanting to see where my site came in since I had already posted this article 14 months ago. I didn't get indexed or I am being blocked again...wth?

I wanted too address this "KENYAN-BORN" 2004 article.

Sorry, but I don't see what the excitement is all about?

As I point out in my own Kenyan-born 2008 notes, (at the bottom of the page in the above link) aprox. 7 days later, at the very same Standard paper, another author wrote that Obama was NOT Kenyan born.

Does one cancel another?

Which is accurate?

There are MANY papers who say he is foreign born- there are far more that say he is Hawaiian born.

Whichever it is may never be discovered unless a Judge with some red white and blue gonads finally allows standing and discovery.

Where is the 'truth' and why has Obama gone to such extraordinary lenghts to hide and seal up all records of his past?

Personally I don't see how anyone who sneers at people questioning Obama and labeling them 'birthers' have any standing while ignoring all of the substantial discovery.

There are far too many unsavory facts about Obama's past and present too ignore. Far too many documented lies.

It is reported Obama has given Lawyers around one million (updated figure:$1,666,397.01 ) dollars to keep anyone from seeing his birth certificate and prevent anyone from getting a day in court.


What, are you flippin' a coin? Easy to avoid all of these lawsuits. Just show the dang BC and keep a million bucks...

Please- don't tell me he already did with the COLB - remember his sister was born out of country and she reportedly HAS a Hawaiian COLB also.

Of all the technical examinations and claims of Pshopped COLB forgery I make no opinion based on those findings. I just don't know.
BUT - the one glaring problem I have with the COLB is where it says:
Father's Race: African.
There is no such RACE.

Please- don't point me in the direction of a Hawaiian Newspaper, showing Obama's birth 9 days After he was born, and scoff sarcastically about how mama must have known her kid would one day be president so she signed him up.

IF Barry was born out-country then Booking lil bams name into a USA newspaper had nothing to do with a natural born status - registering would have been, imo, for the sole purpose of receiving an opportunistic citizen document enabling those grand ole demo "U.S." entitlement hand-outs for mama and son.

Getting away from my point again - Newspapers regarding Obama can be, and have been, changed.

A lot of changes with Obama and his Nobel Cease sized crew.

I have listed here on this site alone 3-4 News articles that were scrubbed entirely and several speech transcripts that were changed.

Anything can be re-written.

Today I saw @ The Captain's Quarters web page a site in the blog roll mentioning the Kenyan - Born 2004 article at Alan Keyes site... in the comment section a Jeff Jones and Captain Steve point out that an original article from the Honolulu Advertiser CHANGED the Sunday, January 8, 2006 article stating that Obama was foreign born.

from article:
"Duckworth is happy to point out that she and Hawai'i-raised Punahou graduate Obama have "a kama'aina connection."

"Both were born outside the country — Obama in Indonesia, Duckworth in Thailand — and graduated from high school in Honolulu — Punahou and McKinley, respectively."

A poster, Jeff Jones, @ Keyes site points out the page scrubbing, and adds:

This morning the same page at same URL says:
"Duckworth is happy to point out that she and Hawaii-raised Punahou graduate Obama have "a kama'aina connection."

Both graduated from high schools in Honolulu — Punahou and McKinley, respectively."

This part of the original article has been removed: "Both were born outside the country — Obama in Indonesia, Duckworth in Thailand — and graduated from high school in Honolulu — Punahou and McKinley, respectively."

Ok, so we can add Indonesia to the list of papers to further confuse the issue while also further fueling opposition feedback and name calling...Such a grand Unifier this Obama - but that's not my issue today.

The scrubbing of the text is the issue. That and the shell game that continues to be played on all of us trying to get to the clusterducked bottom of the Obama truth barrel.

This text was not just cleaned up but the new page at the very same URL (at the top of page) now says:

CORRECTION: A correction on this story was published on Sunday, Jan. 15, 2006: Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., was born in Honolulu on Aug. 4, 1961. A Page One story last Sunday contained incorrect information about his birthplace.

Fine, they made a correction--- nothing to see here - moveon.fightthesmears net- fabricators obscured another one ...

NOT so fast son - ...A correction on this story was published on Sunday, Jan. 15, 2006...


I've looked at the Sunday 15th 2006 Back-Issues page, and also in same date archiveorg pages.

I sure don't see it.

I looked, and looked, and that purported correction, even in the newspapers CORRECTION LINK, just isn't there.

The original page was indexed all the way up until Sept. of 2007 - and no removal-correction of any Text in body of article is displayed. Nor any note at top of any of the archived pages of a correction.

As of just a few days ago this exact same URL did not contain this Sanitized corrective message.

Correct me if I'm wrong.

Somebody at "HA" needs to explain themselves and point out the article's location as Titled...

I'd lay odds, from this country's legion of ObamaNation politic gatekeepers, that just won't happen.

update: This morning I found this on scribd :
GETTING IT STRAIGHT - The Honolulu Advertiser: Archives

Honolulu Advertiser - Honolulu, Hawaii
Date: Jan 15, 2006
Start Page: A.4 Section: Main
Text Word Count: 52
Document Text Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., was born in Honolulu on Aug. 4, 1961. A Page One story last Sunday contained incorrect information about his birthplace.
If you have a question or concern about the accuracy, fairness or thoroughness of an item in The Honolulu Advertiser, please call reader representative Anne Harpham at 525-8033.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without permission.

1 of 1

8/29/09 9:31 PM is a pay for service. It would appear from this paid for search by a ladysaidy that a correction was found in the Honolulu archives on 8/29/09.
I do not use my credit card online for such things so do not know if it's actually an accurate representation, or when it may have been added too an archive; but it does appear to be listed.

The bottom line, so unfortunately, is that when you have a person who is caught in so many lies one just can not 'trust' anything that person says.
When there has been so much erasing, changing, and disappearance of so many documents especially by the media you can't trust them either.

It is still clear that someone added the "correction" only in this last week to the original page - but unclear if there was an actual correction in 2006. Unfortunately, just as the example above shows, the archives could have been manipulated just as the original article was...

Now I'm curious why someone was looking up the 'correction' on 8/29/09 9:31 PM.

Actually- it's a distraction I'll skip.

Some papers state Obama was foreign born - some are adamant about Hawaii - I've read Canada and Seattle and I'm pretty sure I read somewhere he's a space alien too.

I calls em how I sees em - gathering info as I go - and I think this one, as a suspicious cover-up, is in the dead file. The Paper DID change the original page- but there may have been an actual retraction the following week according to the archive listed above.

In this dishonest change-Obamanation one just never knows for sure - do one?

Thursday, October 15, 2009

Transforming America making-O-progress: Apartment residents told to take down U.S. flags

ALBANY, Ore. - At the Oaks Apartments in Albany, the management can fly their own flag advertising one and two bedroom apartments - but residents have been told they can't fly any flags at all.

Jim Clausen flies the American flag from the back of his motorcycle. He has a son in the military heading back to Iraq, and the flag - he said - is his way of showing support.

"This flag stands for all those people," said Clausen, an Oaks Apartment resident. "It stands for the people that can no longer stand - who died in wars. That's why I fly this flag."

But to Oaks Apartment management, Clausen said, the American flag symbolizes problems.

He was told to remove the red, white and blue from both of his rides, or face eviction.

"It floored me," he said. "I can't believe she was saying what she was saying."

Even long-time residents like Sharron White, who has flown a flag on her car for eight years, has been told to take it down.

White said management told her that "someone might get offended."

"Someone might get offended."

Progressive Freedom of liberal speech means they can burn it, and piss on it, but you can't salute it, or fly it.

This revolutionary diversity dissembling of our countries cultural foundations isn't new. It has been building a structural social tear down, and rebuild, machine for decades.

Banning our USA Flag is happening, and has been happening, all across the land...because our proud flag might offend intolerant people with diverse opinions regarding it's historical symbolism ...(or as apologist Mr. WORLD himself could be expected to say over tea at Ayers house with Iminnadinajacket)

...with all it's flaws...

Remember Obama says, "I don’t mind people wearing pins or putting stickers on their cars as a show of support for their country or their cause. I am, however, irritated by the notion that so doing makes them somehow superior to those who don’t."

I'll say it again - It's so nice of Obama to not mind people showing their support for their country, isn't it? ...but what irritates me, is the notion that Obama doesn't seem to understand that The symbol of the USA, it's pins, stickers and Flag, does not make people feel superior.
Mr. Obama --- it makes them feel "PROUD!"

Barry O's 'superior' flag symbol comment foretold his apologizing for America's supposed flawed transgressions and trespasses on the world, to the world.

The manager, Barb Holcomb, of this Apt. complex, who enables America hating agitating complainers, trained by bitter seeking people like dealer Obama, ought to hire an ACORN Boat and get all of your sensitive, fellow traveling, irritated butts the Ef out of our country.

If you Marx Pushers don't like it in America, don't change it - just get the hell out.

update: Upon further review: Flag ban lifted

Tuesday, October 13, 2009

Healthy Change: The Serving Obama ACT - lest We Forget

There is no blue - there is no red- there is no division... there is only America.


A not so funny thing happened on the way to the progressive non-divisive socialist polls - Mr. Unity is changing America into a Soviet style dictatorship.

Some changes are so subtle that none even are aware they have taken place. I digress a little here, but, I was asked the other day 'when do you think Obama will try to get his civilian security force set up?'

Gee- didn't you know? Congress already passed it's formation and funding while we were asleep.
Obama signed The GIVE- "Serve America Act" H.R. 1388 into law waaaay back in April- yep right down to UNIFORMS.
Our kids will be wards of the Obama state of infusion.

This SERVE Obama's Community ACT originally had MANDATORY servitude of our children as volunteers written in it. Mandatory.

Feeling that the mandatory language requirement might keep the first step of progressive slave advancement from passing in the Serve America Act the Mandatory text was switched to establish the Civic Service Act HR 1444...a Mandatory service and academy study.

It is of course a further indoctrination of our kids into the servitude of the liberal politic block during years of mentor processing and orientation.

Re-education camps.

Tiny obscured steps. Yet right in your face.

Millions of people are not laughing. Millions of people are still asleep.

Congress, who's approval rating is down to 22%, continues unabated to slam unpopular Marxist changes down our throats. For an entity with such little support their 'power' marches on as if the 88% mean nothing more than distraction. The locked and loaded Judicial branch swat every attempt to bring back order to the constitution and preservation of lawful grievance as if 'standing' is only reserved for those who can somehow survive amputation of their tongues, starting at their knees.
The media reports nothing on any of these UnAmerican changes and when they do report on Americans who stand up and say "NO YOU CAN'T!" they are labeled right wing terrorists, republican mobs, AstroTurf nothings, or Fox news extremists. If the left news shows up and reports at all on events taking place across the nation they seek out and show only what they think will bleed in their political biased favor. People carrying 'wacko' signs...even if they saw groups of them get off of ACORN buses.

Obama yesterday declared war on FOX news - the ONLY media outlet providing information on what is going on in Obama's nation. The newest Obama rabble rouser, Anita Dunn, says FOX is a right arm of the Republicans. Politically Biased...first off- are you kidding me? The other 20 TV stations aren't Obama swooning tentacles of lefty leg tingling bias? Second - FOX is the only station left/right/ that gives both sides of a story. Third- the ratings show that because the other stations are NOT keeping people informed, people come to FOX to keep up to date on the silenced behind the scenes transformation of America.

The community organizing, tax paid for, speech police attacks from the White House Compound upon FOX fails to understand that they are also attacking the people of America who listen to FOX. In multiplying numbers.

To punish FOX Obama says he won't be doing any interviews with them. Besides being tired of viewing his face on every channel I click through we all know the real reason Obama won't do any interviews is because he would be asked unscripted questions without his puppet props and pre-arranged propaganda.

Today is an important day in American life.

Today we find out how far down the soyent red road of government control will be enacted upon us by this in your face Congress.

This health Bill is not a reformation of Insurance Companies - this is a referendum on control and containment of free people.

The Bill contains expenses of 829 Billion dollars.
So if I get this right- 83% of Americans are now covered - and in order to cover just 11% more people it will cost 82.9 Billion dollars per year.
(Are the remaining 6% going to cost somebody 40 billion more per year in uncovered costs then? Isn't that figure more like 1.2 trillion over ten years?)
After all of the got to get it done, and cover everyone rhetoric - it is reported some 29 million peeps will be uninsured.

Phuzzy math. Phurry feeling. Phoney phonics.

In the words of a well known JAWS quote: We're gona need a bigger jail! Anyone know of a Montana Baucus jail with openings??

Leaving behind for a moment that government spending has us hundreds of trillions of dollars in debt, and they NEVER have balanced a checkbook with their excesses causing every man woman and child owing 343,000 dollars each and growing by the second - forgetting they have never properly regulated anything - what we keep hearing is another 829 Billion is OK so long as the cost doesn't add to the federal deficit...why do we, even IF an accurate amount, keep ignoring that it COSTS 829 BIILION?

Econ-101, someone still has to pay for the 829 BILLION and it isn't gona be Congress with their sweetheart health care.
Who pays?
Forget about the mandatory (free) 1900 fine, or one year in jail if you don't pay a 25,000 buck fine for not being able or willing to pay the fine; forget about the cost of the plan already costing you more than you are paying now by $2,700 too $4,000 a year; I mean why argue.
All these millionaires like Charlie Rangle get away with not paying fines, penalties, taxes, and serving jail time, so why can't you?

Forget about the 11 million illegals who will be conscripted into the Dem party when they pass amnesty expecting pay-back-
Forget about the open borders that will still allow millions more to step across the Obama health care freedom act zone - forget about the 3 million in jail who will actually get free zu zu and wham wham health care -
Forget about the 15 million unemployed who geeeee - can keep their insurance through COBRA even though it costs MORE and you don't have a blasted JOB to continue paying for it anyhow. Have i forgot to add in the millions of government healthy employees who get the special tax paid coverage that won't be contributing to our forced choice of a plan??
Forget about the millions of poor who will be subsidised by those who will have their own rates go up to cover those supplementals. Forget these are the very same poor who go to hospitals now whom we are told have driven medical costs up. Forget if you have ever tried to qualify as being poor enough to receive medical insurance with your clerk estimated $2,500 and one dollar vehicle (that you couldn't get 50 bucks for) that disqualifies you from getting any State help.

Forget about the intrusions into your Bank accounts and IRS filings.

Forget about your preconditional non covered malady that insurance will be forced to give you at a costs you still can not afford.
Forget completely that every amendment the opposition has written to protect citizens from these compulsory Bills have been voted down.
Forget the Conscience Clause that Obama will revoke forcing doctors to treat for abortions. Forget about the 45% of Doctors who say they will just quit if the Plan passes. Forget about the new doctors coming up through schools who Obama's Health Care Czar, Ezekiel, believes will need to be re-taught the non benefits of a do no harm Hippocratic OATH. Forget that the oath and the patient is disposable when that care is too costly; try to forget harm to the Obama system of cost containment outweighs the patients expectation of actual care.
Forget about a non capitalist system in which a doctors education costs can not be sustained by a gov system that reduces costs by reducing doctors pay.
Forget about a medical schooling system with reduced semesters to compensate the high cost of education giving us doctors prepared by third world training camps.

Forget about government run medical services like Medicare-medicaid-Medi-cal-Veterns Medical- all in the red tank. Broke and Broken.
Forget about Massachusetts(I'll spell it right later-maybe) mandatory health system that is broke and seeks federal help.
Forget about the Oregon State Run WE-CARE system who will assist you in a 50 dollar medication-suicide rather than expend capital to extend your life with treatment.

Come on, gather round like a good lil collective and forget that some things have to get done in small Monte steps. As Obama said in his "ME lie??" speech, "To my progressive friends"... Get your foot in the door and kick the competitive capitalist wall down later. Patience comrades. Or some such message.

Now, did I forget to mention MANDATORY participation? A lot of that going 'round.

Forget about the massive distributive bureaucracy to keep TRACK of, who does- who doesn't- who has- who has not- who will- who will not -
Forget they've told us how many zillions they will save on bureaucracy and paperwork.

Forget about that doctor who wants to yank your tonsils - you'll get to take some pills and keep them.

Forget about employers who will continue to have to get rid of people because health costs will continue to rise from this plan that doesn't address anything but TAX-FINE-PENALIZE_ to pay for a health system that

Oh wait, that brings me back full circle too Econ-101 which was my basis for all this forgetfulness...If the plan does nothing more, if it did NOTHING more at all, than to tax Insurance companies and medical labs and medical products then that industry HAS TO PASS the cost on to the consumer.
Premiums have to go up. In fact premiums have to go UP in EXCESS of whatever the natural-unnatural astronomical unaffordable BS costs that has been going up each year now.
The industry can not survive imposed regulations without passing costs on to health care payers. But you can go ahead and KEEP your insurance so long as they can survive. Right?
Regulated Forced Cost Increases (to what purpose one must ask) when the purpose we are fed for hurry up reform is to get costs down.

These Bills' proposals do no such thing. Health care costs are not lessened.

Freedom of CHOICE is not increased by mandate choices.

The only element of cost savings in any of these health care plans is the human cost effectiveness element. Rationing.

Remember Howard Dean standing there telling a crowd that the reason there is no tort reform in any bills is because the LAWYERS wouldn't have gone for it. A reported 400 Billion dollar savings that could reduce our premiums. NO-NO! This of course while they won't listen to everyday people who also say they won't go for it. For some weird reason Dems think all protests are republicans whose campaign dollars they won't get anyway - so screw you.

You think they won't take your DEM health care dollars, like they are taking the seniors, to pay for their other special social entitlements and bankrupt Health Care like they did Social Security?

When you stop looking at the talking head options and look at the body of this compulsory transformation of America there is no beneficial welfare to anyone except the progressive Marx agenda and Obama's redistribution of power.

It is the "change" Obama was talking about to those who understood the language.

Apparently while I have been writ ting this, this draconian Baucus Health Bill, which reportedly no one has read, because as code of guidelines it really hasn't even been written yet, has passed the Senate.
Olympia Snowe, who has become a servant of Obama Alinsky-nomics, voted in favor of Obamacare usage against the will of the majority of American people who said "Leave our health care alone".

Obama calls Snowe's cross-over support a bi-partisan victory.

I wonder what Hugo Chavez calls it?

Obama's transformation Change: Now is the time for all good comrades to come to the aid of the revolution.

Will we wake up in time?

Thursday, October 8, 2009

Congressman Steve King to Obama: FIRE Jennings NOW!

Lawmaker sends letter to Obama: Fire Jennings now

Washington Examiner
By: Byron York
Chief Political Correspondent
10/06/09 2:08 PM EDT
Republican Rep. Steve King is sending a letter to the president today calling for the firing of gay activist Kevin Jennings, head of the Education Department's Office of Safe and Drug Free Schools. "The totality of Mr. Jennings' career has been to advocate for public affirmation of homosexuality," King writes. "There is more to safe and drug free schools than can be accomplished from the narrow view of Mr. Jennings who has, for more than 20 years almost exclusively focused on promoting the homosexual agenda."

In the letter, King points to a foreword Jennings wrote for a 1999 book entitled Queering Elementary Education, as well as Jennings' work as founder of the Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Education Network. King also mentions a 1988 incident in which Jennings, then a teacher, chose not to alert any authorities when he learned of a teenage boy, a student, who had become involved with an adult man. Finally, King points to stories Jennings has told of his own drug use. "Kevin Jennings cannot gain the approval of parents who want their children safe and their schools drug free," King writes.

King is the first member of Congress to call for Jennings' removal. Here is the entire text of the letter to the president:

Dear Mr. President,

I respectfully request that you remove Kevin Jennings, the Assistant Deputy Secretary for the Office of Safe and Drug Free Schools. It is clear that Mr. Jennings lacks the appropriate qualifications and ethical standards to serve in this capacity.

Mr. Jennings life’s work has been the promotion of homosexuality, much of it in our elementary schools. As the founder of the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN), Mr. Jennings has played an integral role in promoting a pro-homosexual agenda in America’s schools. As evidence of this, Kevin Jennings wrote the foreword for a book titled Queering Elementary Education: Advancing the Dialogue About Sexualities and Schooling. Throughout his career, Mr. Jennings has made it his mission to establish special protections for gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgendered students. The totality of Mr. Jennings’ career has been to advocate for public affirmation of homosexuality. There is more to safe and drug free schools than can be accomplished from the narrow view of Mr. Jennings who has, for more than 20 years, almost exclusively focused on promoting the homosexual agenda.

Equally troubling is Mr. Jennings’ self-reported history of ignoring the sexual abuse of a child. In his book, One Teacher in Ten, Mr. Jennings recounts a 15-year old student confiding in him that he had sexual relations with a much older man. Mr. Jennings’ only response was to ask if the underage boy used a condom. Kevin Jennings was a mandatory reporter who was required by law to report child abuse, including sex crimes. If the victim had been a 15-year old girl with a 25-year old man, I suspect Mr. Jennings might have obeyed the law but his career of promoting the homosexual agenda likely affected his judgment. Mr. Jennings cannot serve as the “safe schools” czar when his record demonstrates his willingness to overlook sexual abuse of a child.

As the “safe school” czar, Mr. Jennings is also charged with ensuring our schools and students are drug free. It is clear that Mr. Jennings is unfit to serve in this capacity, as well. His own history of unrepentant drug and alcohol abuse indicates that he is of the opinion that getting drunk and high as a young person is acceptable. In his memoir, Mama’s Boy, Preacher’s Son, Mr. Jennings describes his use of illegal drugs, without expressing regret or acknowledging the devastating effects illegal drug use can have on a person’s life.

Everyone that deals with the education of the most vulnerable must be a positive role model. Our children are not blessed with the wisdom to discern and reject. Children presume the adults who educate them are approved by the larger society and their parents. Kevin Jennings cannot gain the approval of parents who want their children safe and their schools drug free. Perhaps you could replace him with someone who has a record of nurturing and educating children in a safe and moral environment. Given the very serious issues with Mr. Jennings’ record, I urge you to remove him immediately.


Steve King
Member of Congress

If history repeats itself - and it does- This letter will get about as much response as Mr. King's letter back in March to disqualify Obama's Legal Council, Ms. Dawn pro-life-is-servitude-to-the-state, Johnsen. (who is expected to be confirmed any day now.)

"Judge me by the people with whom I surround myself". Obama- 2008 campaign