Tuesday, April 29, 2008

Obama's Race Speech: "The ObamaCON"

by greybeard

It becomes clear that Obama has been indoctrinated for at least 20 years by the Reverend Wright and the "black liberation theology".
It is obvious that this theology and Politics go hand in hand.

Just what is this theology that Barack believes in and worships in?

...soldiers for Black freedom ...Marxism... separatism...hatred

From the TUCC's own website:
(which they continue to clean up and REMOVE racist content from) in the Reverend Wright's own words ( here: )...

..."The vision statement of Trinity United Church of Christ is based upon the systematized liberation theology that started in 1969 with the publication of Dr. James Cone’s book, Black Power and Black Theology."

In a Sean Hannity interview I watched on Fox news, Reverend Wright repeatedly interrupted Hannity asking if Hannity had ever read James Cone...Cone, Cone, Cone, Cone, as if Hannity's ignorance of what black liberation theology was precluded him from asking his questions.

WRIGHT: Do you know black liberation theology?

Curious, I looked up "black liberation theology" and this James Cone. I would say you will have to do your own search, and, as Reverend Wright insisted of Hannity, just read.

So who is James Cone and what is a snippet of this Cone-gurus system of 'liberation' ideology that the Reverend Wright and his website declares is the basis for the foundation of the church Obama would like us to believe didn't exist as portrayed while he was in the pews?
CONE:..."Black theology refuses to accept a God who is not identified totally with the goals of the black community.

If God is not for us and against white people, then he is a murderer, and we had better kill him.
The task of black theology is to kill Gods who do not belong to the black community. . . . Black theology will
accept only the love of God which participates in the destruction of the white enemy. What we need is the divine love as expressed in Black Power, which is the power of black people to destroy their oppressors here and now by any means at their disposal.
Unless God is participating in this holy activity, we must reject his love

..."the destruction of the white enemy...or, reject god's love....".

Christianity, or philosophy?

Wright's mentor Cone: ..."Black theology will accept only the love of God which participates in the destruction of the white enemy."

Obama's mentor, Wright: God Dam America! ...white racist America...

Obama's mentors Nation: the U.S. of KKK A.

Methinks Obama is extremely slick. Makes one think of a Manchurian Candidate.

The Communist Party USA , and Democratic-Socialists websites worship Barack.

Can one determine a persons character by the company they keep? What of those who flock to that person in belief his character will support their message? "Guilt by Association" is continuing to be ignored by the liberal apologists.

Obama has removed a page at his site in which the NEW an improved Black Panther Party submitted their endorsement and their stamp of approval of Obama who they feel can help them to further their own agenda.

Their message is much the same as the TUCC's. Again, One has to read their website, and make up their own mind as to the similarities of victimization, hatred, self sustainment and separatism ect.. They (BPP) want white America separated from blacks and for whites to purchase and provide them land to colonize.

When asked, a campaign spokesperson said THE NEWBPP addition was removed because they didn't agree with an agenda promoting 'violence.' (NOT that the message or agenda itself was disagreeable...)

Did Obama sit in this church, while spiritually advised by Reverend Wright himself, and finally find himself in a community he could belong too, while unaware of the foundation of this divisive, racist, separatist, hateful, bigoted, Un-American ideology?

This is a man of "UNITY?"

Now, Obama can him&haw all he wants, so eloquently, to TRY to continue his Deceptions (lies: and there are many) like for instance, "I never heard Rev. Wright say any of these things"...
and when pressured days later to admit that he HAD (lied)--- but, that he didn't agree with Rev. Wright.

Come on.

Obama claims that "not once" in his conversations with Wright had he heard Wright talk about any ethnic group "in derogatory terms."

In his Book , "Dreams of my father", Obama tells of an 1990 Wright sermon that preached of a world of white greed, "a world where cruise ships throw away more food than most residents of Port-au-Prince see in a year, where white folks' greed runs a world in need, apartheid in one hemisphere, apathy in another hemisphere...

And so it went, a meditation on a fallen world. While the boys next to me doodled on their church bulletin, Reverend Wright spoke of Sharpesville and Hiroshima, the callousness of policy makers in the White House and in the State House."

So Obama tells us in Wrights sermon that his pastor talked in derogatory terms regarding "white folks", Hiroshima, and denouncements against the USA.

Here's a funny thing though --- In reading Reverend Wrights 1990 sermon "The Audacity of Hope" there doesn't seem to be any mention at all of greedy white folks or cruise ships...or Port-au-Prince or Sharpesville or the White House. Close as it comes is mentioning 'apartheid' and 'white on rice".

I supposed he'd say it must have been a different sermon, but then he would fall into the trap of acknowledging and hearing these type of sermons many times- but he didn't agree with them;

Or, Obama would have to admit that - Port-au-Prince, greedy white folks, cruise ships... Sharpesville and the calloused White House were OBAMA's own words and thoughts.

Let me just clarify, since I continue to read bloggers elsewhere, and the News media, write or say, that Reverend Wright said these things in his sermon. Read the sermon.
No where in it does Wright use the words... greedy white folks, or cruise ships...or Port-au-Prince or Sharpesville, or references to the uncaring White House.

These are Obama's words, thoughts, and USofA reflections in his book..."greedy white folks."

People keep saying that IF it's proved that Obam was in the Congregation or knew of the racist hatred spewed there, that it's all over for him ... Nah, the Media knows, the Super delegates know, the Democrats know.

Jim Davis, of NewsMax, was in the congregation the day that... "Wright laced into America's establishment, blaming the "white arrogance" of America's Caucasian majority for the woes of the world, especially the oppression suffered by blacks.

To underscore the point he refers to the country as the "United States of White America." Many in the congregation, including Obama, nodded in apparent agreement as these statements were made."

All one has to do is read Mr. Obama's Book, Dreams from My Father, to see how Obama fit right into this racist theology... a book insistent upon rejecting the white race, self-pity, anger, resentment and "wrestle(ing) with distinction between good and bad whites and it's negligible meaning."

"I gathered books from the library--Baldwin, Ellison, Hughes, Wright, DuBois...Only Malcom X's autobiography seemed to offer something different.....I knew as well that traveling down the road to self-respect my own white blood would never recede into mere abstraction"

Post racial?

Who is this Senator Obama?

For many years the Church website flew an African Black Liberation Flag; nary an American flag anywhere on the site.

One of The websites 12 step program's requirements is:(which also has been removed, but can be found)

..."A Pledge allegiance to all Black leadership who espouse and embrace the Black Value System. "

Being that the black Value system appears to be founded, in Rev Wrights words and website content, on Black Power, Black liberation theology and, based on James Cone's racist ideology one has to wonder where exactly Mr. Obama's "Pledge of Allegiance" lies in an American system of equality and unity.

A Pledge Allegiance to what now has been shown to be an entirely bigoted racist system of values is not one of equality and unity.

A systematized liberation message that when exposed Obama is late in disowning and disapproving of. Or has he?

Could this explain Obama's reluctance to wear an American Flag pin? To salute the American Flag in a proud manner?
Is it why he voted against "The Flag Protection Amendment"? An Amendment protecting our Nations Flag from being desecrated. Protecting Our American Flag went down in flames by one Vote.
Guess who's.

Barack Obama calls flag pinsa substitute for true patriotism.”

Obama says, "I don’t mind people wearing pins or putting stickers on their cars as a show of support for their country or their cause" states Obama. "I am, however, irritated by the notion that so doing makes them somehow superior to those who don’t."

It's so nice of Obama to not mind people showing their support for their country...but what irritates me, is the notion that Senator Obama doesn't seem to understand that The symbol of the USA, it's pins, stickers and Flag, does not make people feel superior.
Mr. Obama --- it makes them feel "PROUD!"

One has to continue to question, no matter how unifying a sounding speech, his participation in, and being mentored and spiritually advised, by a bigot who damns America and it's white racists society, while requiring men women boys and girls in the 'teaching' of, the Disavowal of the Pursuit of "Middleclassness" and servants in the captors "white value system".

What is "middleclassness" according to The Unity (unity?) Church's website page? ("middleclassness" has also been removed from their site).

..."Disavowal of the Pursuit of “Middleclassness

"Classic methodology on control of captives teaches that captors must keep the captive ignorant educationally, but trained sufficiently well to serve the system. Also, the captors must be able to identify the “talented tenth” of those subjugated, especially those who show promise of providing the kind of leadership that might threaten the captor’s control.

Those so identified as separated from the rest of the people by:

Killing them off directly, and/or fostering a social system that encourages them to kill off one another.

Placing them in concentration camps, and/or structuring an economic environment that induces captive youth to fill the jails and prisons.

Seducing them into a socioeconomic class system which while training them to earn more dollars, hypnotizes them into believing they are better than others and teaches them to think in terms of “we” and “they” instead of “us”.

So, while it is permissible to chase “middle-incomeness” with all our might, we must avoid the third separation method-the psychological entrapment of Black “middleclassness”: If we avoid the snare, we will also diminish our “voluntary” contributions to methods A and B. And more importantly, Black people no longer will be deprived of their birthright, the leadership, resourcefulness, and example of their own talented persons. "
So, Do not strive towards a white middleclassedness or you are a captive sell out...

Whites have structured an economic environment to keep the black in concentration camps...jail

We are supposed to believe Obama doesn't know the edicts of his own church's mantra and it's value system?

Who's structured theology is 'purposely "keeping the black man down", Mr. Obama?

Who is it that is being accused of this killing off of the talented 10th, Mr. Obama?

"WE, "THEY," or "US"?

I suppose one could say it's just words... But as Mr. Obama would tell us- "Don't Tell me words don't matter"

So I fail to see just how "black anger" is being healed here, Mr. Obama?

Further, I'd like to know weather you ever stood up and said, "You know (despite the fact that I need your 8,000 votes locally) I have to disagree with this divisive mindset and try to make a 'change' in this communities destructive, bigoted, environment...."WE" must move forward."

Wait! We know you didn't. We also know in your continued participation in this church's philosophy that you won't.

Sorry, even without Reverend Wrights video exposures, that we could 'watch in Loops and Loops', as you call it, the basic foundation of this church's teachings is not 'unity', and there simply is no way you can talk away another "boneheaded mistake" like your Rezko "budship", while continuing to pronounce your wondrous 'judgment' qualities and decision making abilities.

Who benefits from this type of teaching/preaching? Perhaps The Wrights, the Sharptons,' the Jesse Jacksons,...See The TUCC's newest requests for additional donations...to fight this new oppression.

Perhaps as Booker T would point out, and did:

My Larger Education, Being Chapters from My Experience (1911)

"There is another class of coloured people who make a business of keeping the troubles, the wrongs, and the hardships of the Negro race before the public. Having learned that they are able to make a living out of their troubles, they have grown into the settled habit of advertising their wrongs — partly because they want sympathy and partly because it pays. Some of these people do not want the Negro to lose his grievances, because they do do not want to lose their jobs.

Ch. V: The Intellectuals and the Boston Mob
I am afraid that there is a certain class of race-problem solvers who don't want the patient to get well, because as long as the disease holds out they have not only an easy means of making a living, but also an easy medium through which to make themselves prominent before the public.


It is certainly no wonder at all that Michelle Obama is so surprised by the success of her husband when they both have been indoctrinated to believe that they have been victimized by the white establishment. Even Obama stated he was surprised to be where he was. But let Bill Clinton call it a fairy Tale and now it's a racial slur.

The race card has been played many times by Obama, he just isn't called on it.

Obama's own repeated words (just words?) of ...

"THEY said...WE couldn't do it", shouted 'race' content, and a Thank you to Pokey and Ray-Ray whom Obama called upon to get out and vote.

"THEY <-- certainly doesn't mean Republicans, and "WE" <-- absolutely didn't mean "Democrats".

Perhaps "They" are the "rich white people" learned at the pulpit of a Wright maddrasa type of hate speech and division?

When you don't agree with the church- you leave that church- you have a choice. When you agree with the views and principles of a church, you join it.

You certainly couldn't get me to join David Duke's Party just because I lived there and they were white people.

Obama made a choice.

Obama's response to the Revernd Wright's inexcusable words are more inexcusable excuses.

Obama says "The anger is real..."

Well it's clear that if one injects anger and resentment into it's family, or congregation, one certainly isn't 'moving forward' or advancing "racial stalemate" and "unity".

Obviously the 'white' voters didn't see a racial divide. "They" believed in 'change.'

I believe most believed the message was a change in "Politics as usual", in the white house.

Whites didn't Consciously see Obama as a 'black man'. They think they saw a man of integrity, honesty, a gentleman of America ,and it's values, in his eloquent untity speeches.
Well, at least the 'center' and right of center Democrats.
The left of left knew exactly what language Obama was really speaking...

Obama's excuse for this typical behavior is an apologetic understanding of what appears to be the years of whites resentment and blacks anger;

Meanwhile denying that he ever was aware of Reverend Wright's views and racial anger.
Where did you hear of all this 'black anger' from then ?

Disingenious is a polite way of saying, B.S.

It wasn't really clear what Obama ment by white resentment or what caused it. He alluded to afirmitive action (rather than "reverse discrimination") because they feel blacks are often given an unfair advantage.

Obama: "When they are told to bus their children to a school across town, when they hear that an African-American is getting an advantage in landing a good job or a spot in a good college because of an injustice that they themselves never committed, when they're told that their fears about crime in urban neighborhoods are somehow prejudiced, resentment builds over time," he said.
Reverse , Forward, Neutral, static --Discrimination is still Discrimination

Obama is right about one thing though. Many are sick and tired of the race card and the complaining about something that occurred decades and decades ago that we had nothing whatsoever to do with. Slavery centuries ago? Nothing to personaly do with.
Jim crow? Nothing to do with.

Lynchings? Nothing to do with it. Segregation? Nothing to do with it. Prejudice? Not in my house.

To continually blame peoples ancestors of today for the tragic human rights issues of the terrible past - is like blaming OBAMA - who is so proud of his LUO Tribe- for that tribes African history of tracking down, pilaging, murdering, raping, and capturing FOR SALE other tribes people into slavery. The Luo and Arabs were the main procurers and exporters of human slavery.

Is Obama responsible for that?
Of course not.
But we are responsible for what we do, say, and teach today.

You want to have a Conversation???

We haven't worked hard to ERASE the enslavement past as if it doesn't exist.
But we as a nation have worked dilengently to rectify it by acknowledging it and have tried hard to correct all of our ancestors bloody mistakes.

We must Move Forward for healing.

Reverend Wrights Church, its racist ideology, its hatred for this Country, the exposure that this goes on everywhere in churches promoting a new generation of racsim, sets me back on my heels.

The fact that someone like Obama, and his growing list of comrades, under Wright's tuteluge and race hating ideology, could somehow be in charge of the debate, and this Countries checkbook , is wrong. It is an Abomination for our nation.

The group of Obama mentors and teachers must be viewed as they actualy are rather than the obscurity Obama would paint to an uninformed public. Why revise the truth unless you have something to hide?

Barack would describe his mother as " a free-spirited wanderer," a simple girl from Kansas, when in reality Obama’s mother was a radical Marxist, avowed atheist, and a practitioner of "critical theory.”

Obama sat in a cafe in middle America and told peoples that his mother was Christian... She was not a Christian - Obama will conjere up whatever image his particular audience's 'story' is.

In reality Obama's mother is described by her friends as a "fellow traveler"... as was Obama's father. She is also most definately described as an atheist and not a Christian.

"The term, fellow traveler, is most often applied to a sympathizer of Communism.

From the dinner table at home, your Marxist Professors, and Racist Pastors, to your friends that you hang with, who you learn from, forms your character and perhaps your destiny.

How can Obama speak of understanding white resentment (his words) when in his book not only does he state that he resents his mother's race, (white) and how he stayed far away from whites to avoid being mistaken as a sellout? He also brags about the 'friends he kept 'close' to him of choice.

From Obama's book, " DREAMS FROM MY FATHER: A STORY OF RACE AND INHERITANCE" and his relationship to unity; or a perception of selling out to 'whites':

excerpt: "To avoid being mistaken for a sellout, I chose my friends carefully. The more politically active black students. The foreign students. The Chicanos. The Marxist Professors and the structural feminists and punk-rock performance poets.

We smoked cigarettes and wore leather jackets. At night, in the dorms, we discussed neocolonialism, Franz Fanon, Eurocentrism, and patriarchy. When we ground out our cigarettes in the hallway carpet or set our stereos so loud that the walls began to shake,we were resisting bourgeois society's stifling constraints. We weren't indifferent or careless or insecure. We were alienated"

There is a continous pattern seen in Obama's written philosophy, in friends, family, and his words...resisting bourgeois society

n., pl. bourgeois.

  1. A person belonging to the middle class.
  2. A person whose attitudes and behavior are marked by conformity to the standards and conventions of the middle class.
  3. In Marxist theory, a member of the property-owning class; a capitalist.

In Reverend Wright, Obama found a home where resisting "middleclassedness' was not just a Pledge, but an ideology of theology built from the foundation of Karl Marx for neo-blackness.

Thus, choosing friends carefully was another "boneheaded" display of Obamas great judgement process of belonging 'outside the race he resented'.

Obama makes no excuses for his choice of friends and mentors. AND...

Obama makes no references to where, or when, or that, he had a great revelation and changed his preferences.

Perhaps we have to wait for a NEW and improved Book.

You won't find his Books at the UTCC anymore tho - they too have been removed.

Obama seems to understand that white society has not been 'static' while this Reverend Wright "flap" ( as Obama calls it) and his church has not moved forward.

BUT he can no more disown Reverend Wright then he can the black community...this community being taught to separate itself from whites into a more perfect union of self determination through Black Power and Alegience based on James Cone's Principles of hatred.

How does Obama propose to "change" that? Or does Obama propose to 'change' it at all? Does Obama expect others to integrate 'understanding' through continued 'guilt trips' and condone silently this black anger that is contributing to it's own 'servitude' of self destructive enslavement to it's angry hate spewing Leaders?.

Why is it that the excuse is we need to understand this black anger? Understand what? That you need to have more time to teach continious generations of hatred and racism rather than move past victimization?

Obamas explanation of not leaving this racist church is that Reverend Wright has retired, and so this is a moot issue.

No. No it does not close the issue or change the basis of the foundation of the churchs edict and message to never 'get past the issue of race religion and region' or time and engulf itself, and selfs, in past history.

Although many decades in evolving, whites certainly have moved forward in unifiying America as Americans, while not seeing color.
(YES, yes, there are some of course who don't fit this description and certainly they have their own mentors keeping them informed and motivated - and if one of them ever runs for an office i won't stand in a white line to get them in office)

Personally I know of NOONE who is racist. It simply is not a matter of conversation or philosophy. The only time i have ever heard this "N" word, at least in last 30 years, it has come out of an African-American mouth. Continously.

In what now is reported as thousands of communities like Reverend Wrights, it appears that it is these types of "teaching grounds" that have remained 'static', embroiled in victimization, separtism, anger and hatred.

Michell's statement of suddenly being proud of America for the first time in her life is also a revelation of this programming.

Like coming out of a stupor of 20 years of being programmed to condemn and dam America, she realized that Obama's success was a 'unity' of the ALREADY 'changed' and colorless vision, of and , by Americans who saw him too as such.

Maybe she'll write a new Thesis of how she was brainwashed into believing she didn't 'belong' in a room full of whites.

And, What an illusionist art our Obama.

..."The task of black theology is to kill Gods who do not belong to the black community. . . .Black theology will accept only the love of God which participates in the destruction of the white enemy"

This is some 'sort of' Christianity that Obama worships??

We've hear on television from others...what's the big deal? This happens in lots of black churches...

You're kidding?


How can Obama expose his own children to this abuse?

Once one begins to see the ideologic structure, in which Obama's character has been formed, his delivered words take on an entirely different meaning than 'hope'.

pairing growth - economic fairness - shared prosperity - poverty of ambition

Who talks like this?

Think about it.

Karl Marx.

This man shouldn't even be a Senator.

His voting record of "PRESENT" has kept him, and his views, an obscure chamelion.

He's been paid as a Senator for 14 months of campaigning while never even having to do his job.

He's in charge of the Afghan Committee - and he campaigns that we should be there and not in Iraq- YET he has NEVER even called a meeting.

His lies continue to acumilate.

Senator Obama's fall, should it occur, has set back 30 years of progress with his own deception and the anger it will generate.

Senator OBAMA'S triumph, should he succeed, has prepetrated a fraudulent Image and a delegate blackmail.

Obama created division because of what and who he has turned out to Actually be.

"Hope" means different things to different people and Senator Obama has failed the message of 'Hope' for any to the Right of his Leftist views and obscured ideology.

What is written here appears to be just the tip of an iceberg. What lies below the surface of this face of Barack Obama we have been shown; or more implicitly the face we haven't been shown?

Without doubt this man should NEVER become President of our United States of America.

To elect Obama would be an ultimate "Hoax" upon us all.

God Bless America!


Post a Comment