Friday, October 23, 2009

Oath to the Constitution: Barack Obama's Birth Certificate

This week I got involved responding (in the comments area) to the ole Obama BC versus COLB controversy.
I'm not well read up on the issue though I followed many websites who did Tech work on the Bama COLB last year.
Texasdarling (seems to require a password now) and Atlas-shrugged had many Technical findings of COLB forgery explanations that I just couldn't follow or duplicate as a non-techie.
IF the Tech findings are accurate then the Obama COLB is a forgery.

The ridiculing Obama clan, who produce not a single image analysis expert of their own,(that I am aware of) quickly labeled anyone who believed in the findings to be "birthers" and settled on a term of endearment for "birthers" that they hold to be without question, self evident- birthers are idiots.

Oh, you're one of those poor delusional thing, you.

Here's the one thing - the foundational premise for being such a 'birther' tracks to a basic fundamental issue that should never be held in ridicule and contempt. Our Constitution.

In reality an Obama disdainfully labeled 'birther' is a constitutionalists seeking to have the Constitution upheld.

Alinsky tactics can never shame one for taking that position.

People across the land who have questioned Obama's 'constitutional' eligibility to the Office of POTUS in court after court have been turned away due to lack of what the 'justice' system calls lack of 'standing'.

I've never understood how American citizens have no legal standing when it comes to a constitutional issue being violated.
If a person is violating someones constitutional rights- he is first assumed innocent until proven guilty - but the case is not thrown out BEFORE the facts are presented by both sides and a judgment can be rendered on the evidence. Apparently this type of accusatory specified individualized constitutional 'injury' is acceptable as standing.

That was probably a bad example and or poorly explained - bottom line is if the Constitution Has Been violated all of these Judges who took an oath to uphold it, and protect it, have washed their hands of their responsibility too it, and turned their backs on the people who stand up for it, denying their day in court and due process.

Obama is being accused of perpetrating a fraud in violation of our Constitution which injures every individual.

The Constitution itself has been injured, if not mortally changed, without review or Amendment.

Historically our founding fathers had an absolute intent when they specified in Article II Section 1, Clause 5 that none other than a "natural born" citizen was qualified to hold the office of POTUS and command the armies of the US.

Natural born does not mean... without an epidural.

Vattel in 1758. In book one chapter 19, § 212. of Citizens and naturals.
The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights

Natural born means having both parents of US citizenship.

That is the definition of a “natural born Citizen,” as recognized by numerous U.S. Supreme Court and lower court decisions (The Venus, 12 U.S. 253(1814), Shanks v. Dupont, 28 U.S. 242 (1830), Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1856), Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1875) , Ex parte Reynolds, 20 F. Cas. 582 (C.C.W.D. Ark 1879), United States v. Ward, 42 F. 320 (1890); Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), Ludlam, Excutrix, & c., v. Ludlam, 26 N.Y. 356 (1863)

Obama's father was Not a US citizen. He was a British citizen who passed that citizenship to Obama Jr. when Obama was born.

Whether Obama was born in Hawaii, or on the moon, or whether the COLB is true or false, is probably keeping lots of us distracted from a more primary issue; and that is that Obama, at birth, without question, held Dual citizenships.

This is Unconstitutional.

Obama is not constitutionally eligible to hold the office of the President of the United States.

Will any citizen, natural or otherwise, ever get a day in court to return our documents intent to it's rightful nature?

Alan Keyes case is reported by Captain's Quarters to actually be scheduled with DATES to proceed.
Apparently Mr. Keyes run for president is considered, so far, as the only 'individual' who may have been 'injured' by a dishonest Birth-defect action of Obama.
But, everywhere one reads the Judge in the case appears to be doing some back-peddling and squirrely things. He reportedly hired one of Obama's legal team as a clerk? I would say he wants to be disqualified. Case to be passed on to someone who will throw it out.

I also fear this Orly Taitz case will be a terrible blow in further attempts to bring any future cases due to this Kenyan BC that is being presented to the court that looks as phony as an Obama promise.

I have no faith that a court will ever proceed and find in favor of the people of the United States. The Obama liberal judges won't go against clan principle and the Constitutionalists judge just won't chance shouting "fire" in our theater.

So how do we enforce our constitution if the courts won't?

I thought a lot about this and I have come up with an idea.

First we MUST make sure that in 2010 the House and Senate majority is replaced by strong constitutional Honest Independent and Republican patriots. (Many Republican's need to be replaced also!)
Without these, balancing power, the social-Marxist-Maoist changers will continue to implement Obamas' conquest policies for another full 2 years.

Then the idea is: We must insist through letters and emails and calls that this new majority of representatives produce a BILL that all future presidential candidates MUST produce for inspection an original long form BC. The BILL must also clarify that a "natural born" citizen is a child born of TWO US citizens as to the intent of the founding fathers in prohibiting dual citizen allegiance.

Now, having thought this over for about 3 days look what I came across when I asked google search if anyone has thought about writing a BILL...(I'm always months behind with ideas :)

The Presidential Eligibility Act (H.R. 1503) - March 12, 2009

Washington, May 15 - On March 12, 2009 Congressman Posey introduced H.R. 1503, a bill to amend the Federal Election Campaign Act to require beginning in 2012, the principal campaign committee of a candidate for election to the Office of President to include with the committee's statement of organization documentation (including a birth certificate) as may be necessary to establish that the candidate meets the qualifications for eligibility to the Office of President under the Constitution.

..."meets the qualifications for eligibility to the Office of President under the Constitution."

This Bill has gone no-where; it languishes in Committee.

Too my fellow readers -In your travels to strong major informational sites you might want to remind people who don't know about this Bill that it will need support and point them to the Congressman's website.
Be sure to ask for a "natural citizen" intent clause to be in it.

Cheers! Have a gd day.


Paul said...

Was the $20K fine enough? Maybe when Taitz becomes a real lawyer she will appreciate what just happened. I wonder if she is a mail order bride, just like her law degree? She is perfect reporter material for “Fake News”, where unfounded rumors and innuendo reign supreme , unlike a our US courts of law, where you need to present documented facts, not half baked lies (prepare for more failures).

When flies get too close to the lights they get burned, Taitz just got burned, thing is, like a fly she will continue, no end in sight. Poor little Birthers they are haters not debaters.

A lawyer, dentist, realtor and black belt, wow I must say a JACK of all trades master of none.

Post a Comment